Effect of low-intensity long-duration ultrasound on the symptomatic relief of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study

被引:29
|
作者
Draper, David O. [1 ]
Klyve, Dominic [2 ]
Ortiz, Ralph [4 ]
Best, Thomas M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Exercise Sci, 106 SFH, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Cent Washington Univ, Dept Math, Ellensburg, WA USA
[3] Univ Miami, UHlth Sports Performance & Wellness Inst, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[4] Med Pain Consultants, Dryden, NY USA
关键词
Osteoarthritis; Pain; Low-intensity ultrasound; Knee; Long duration; Musculoskeletal; Sustained acoustic medicine; THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND; PULSED ULTRASOUND; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; ARTHRITIS; PAIN; HIP;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-018-0965-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWearable long-duration low-intensity ultrasound is an emerging non-invasive and non-narcotic therapy for the daily treatment of musculoskeletal pain. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to examine whether long-duration low-intensity ultrasound was effective in treating pain and improving function in patients with knee osteoarthritis.MethodsNinety patients with moderate to severe knee pain and radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade I/II) were randomized for treatment with active (n=55) or placebo (n=35) devices applied daily to the treated knee. Investigators and subjects were blinded to treatment groups. Ultrasound (3MHz, 0.132W/cm(2), 1.3W) was applied with a wearable device for 4h daily for 6weeks, delivering 18,720J per treatment. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity (numeric rating scale) assessed prior to intervention (baseline) and after 6weeks. Secondary outcomes of functional change were measured at baseline and after 6weeks using the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Questionnaire (n=84), along with range of motion (flexion, extension) and isometric muscle strength (flexion, extension and rotation) tests on the injured knee in a small pilot subset (n=17).ResultsThe study had a 93% retention rate, and there were no significant differences between the groups regarding demographic variables or baseline outcome measures. Patients treated with active therapy observed a significant mean NRS pain reduction over the 6-week study of 1.96 points for active (p<0.0001), compared with a 0.85 points reduction for placebo (p=0.13). The functional score was also significantly improved by 505 points for the active group over the 311-point improvement for placebo group compared to baseline (p=0.02). In the pilot subset evaluated, rotational strength increased from baseline to 6weeks (3.2N, p=0.03); however, no other measures were significant.ConclusionsLong-duration low-intensity ultrasound significantly reduced pain and improved joint function in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis knee pain. The clinical findings suggest that ultrasound may be used as a conservative non-pharmaceutical and non-invasive treatment option for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additional research is warranted on non-weight bearing joints of the musculoskeletal system as well as extended treatment time frames and follow-up.Trial registrationNCT02083861, registered 11 March 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02083861
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combining two hyaluronic acids in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Robert J. Petrella
    Anthony Cogliano
    Joseph Decaria
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2008, 27 : 975 - 981
  • [32] Effects of Golden Plaster on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Chen, Yan
    Liu, Jintao
    Li, Xiaofeng
    Tang, Dezhi
    Jin, Xiaoqin
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Ji, Wanbo
    Tao, Shuai
    Jiang, Hong
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [33] Interferential current and photobiomodulation in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial
    Alqualo-Costa, Renata
    Rampazo, Erika Patricia
    Thome, Gustavo Ribeiro
    Perracini, Monica Rodrigues
    Liebano, Richard Eloin
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 35 (10) : 1413 - 1427
  • [34] Combining two hyaluronic acids in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Petrella, Robert J.
    Cogliano, Anthony
    Decaria, Joseph
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 27 (08) : 975 - 981
  • [35] Is hyaluronate sodium effective in the management of knee osteoarthritis? A placebo-controlled double-blind study
    Kul-Panza, E.
    Berker, N.
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2010, 101 (02) : 63 - 72
  • [36] Lack of efficacy of acetaminophen in treating symptomatic knee osteoarthritis - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison trial with diclofenac sodium
    Case, JP
    Baliunas, AJ
    Block, JA
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (02) : 169 - 178
  • [37] DHEP PLASTERS AS A TOPICAL TREATMENT OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS - A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    DREISER, RL
    TISNECAMUS, M
    DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 19 (03) : 117 - 123
  • [38] Magnetic pulse treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Pipitone, N
    Scott, DL
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2001, 17 (03) : 190 - 196
  • [39] A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Study Evaluating Individualized Homeopathy in Managing Pain of Knee Osteoarthritis
    Koley, Munmun
    Saha, Subhranil
    Ghosh, Shubhamoy
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 20 (03): : 186 - 191
  • [40] Efficacy and Safety of Stempeucel in Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Gupta, Pawan Kumar
    Maheshwari, Sunil
    Cherian, Joe Joseph
    Goni, Vijay
    Sharma, Arun Kumar
    Tripathy, Sujith Kumar
    Talari, Keerthi
    Pandey, Vivek
    Sancheti, Parag Kantilal
    Singh, Saurabh
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Kumar, Uday
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (09): : 2254 - 2266