Follow-up of renal function in treated and untreated older patients with isolated systolic hypertension

被引:98
|
作者
Voyaki, SM
Staessen, JA
Thijs, L
Wang, JG
Efstratopoulos, AD
Birkenhäger, WH
de Leeuw, PW
Leonetti, G
Nachev, C
Rodicio, JL
Tuomilehto, J
Fagard, R
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mol & Cardiovasc Onderzoek, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Gen Hosp Athens, Dept Internal Med, Athens, Greece
[3] Gen Hosp Athens, Dept Internal Med, Athens, Greece
[4] Gen Hosp Athens, Hypertens Unit, Athens, Greece
[5] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Rijksuniv Maastricht, Dept Inwendige Geneeskunde, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Milan, Osped Maggiore, Ctr Fisiol Clin & Ipertens, Milan, Italy
[8] Univ Milan, Osped Maggiore, Ist Auxol Italiano, Milan, Italy
[9] Alexandrovs Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Sofia, Bulgaria
[10] Hosp 12 Octubre, Unidad Hypertens, Madrid, Spain
[11] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Promot, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
calcium-channel blockade; diabetes mellitus; isolated systolic hypertension; proteinuria; renal function; serum creatinine;
D O I
10.1097/00004872-200103000-00020
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background In the outcome trials that provided information on renal function in older hypertensive patients, diuretics and beta -blockers were mostly used as first-line drugs. The long-term renal effects of calcium-channel blockers remain unclear. Objective To compare the changes in renal function in 2258 treated and 2148 untreated patients with isolated systolic hypertension, of whom 455 had diabetes mellitus and 390 had proteinuria, Methods We performed a post-hoc analysis of the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial. Active treatment was initiated with nitrendipine (10-40 mg/day) with the possible addition of enalapril (5-20 mg/day), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg/day), or both, titrated or combined to reduce the sitting systolic blood pressure by at least 20 mmHg, to less than 150 mmHg, The main outcome measures were serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance calculated by the formula of Cockroft and Gault, Results Serum creatinine concentration at the time when participants were randomly allocated to study groups was less than 176.8 mu mol/l (2.0 mg/dl), averaging 88 mu mol/l. AR the time of the last serum creatinine measurement, the blood pressure difference(P< 0.001) between the two groups was 11.6/4.1 mmHg. In the intention-to-treat analysis (11 427 patient-years), serum creatinine and the calculated creatinine clearance were not influenced by active treatment. However, in the patients assigned randomly to receive active treatment, the incidence of mild renal dysfunction (serum creatinine at least 176.8 mmol/l) decreased by 64% (P= 0.04) and that of proteinuria by 33%(P= 0.03). Active treatment reduced the risk of proteinuria more in diabetic than in non-diabetic patients: by 71%, compared with 20% (P= 0.04). In non-proteinuric patients, active treatment did not influence serum creatinine, whereas in patients with proteinuria at entry to the study, serum creatinine decreased on active treatment (P< 0.001). Furthermore, in on-randomized treatment comparison stratified for risk at baseline, serum creatinine concentration did not change (P= 0.98) in patients continuing to receive monotherapy with nitrendipine, whereas it increased by 6.73 mmol/l (P< 0.001) in patients who received hydrochlorothiazide alone or in combination with other study medication (P< 0.001 for difference in trends). Conclusions In alder patients with isolated systolic hypertension, antihypertensive treatment starting with the dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker, nitrendipine, did not decrease blood pressure at the expense of renal function and prevented the development of proteinuria, especially in diabetic patients. J Hypertens 19:511-519 (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 519
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RESULTS FROM THE FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH RENAL DENERVATION FOR SEVERE HYPERTENSION
    Yaneva-Sirakova, T.
    Karamfiloff, K.
    Dosev, L.
    Naunov, V.
    Stoykova, J.
    Vassilev, D.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E122 - E122
  • [22] RENAL DENERVATION IN PATIENTS WITH RESISTANT HYPERTENSION: 12 MONTH FOLLOW-UP
    Dores, Helder
    Branco, Patricia
    Sousa, Henrique Silva
    Carvalho, Maria Salome
    Goncalves, Pedro
    Almeida, Manuel
    Andrade, Maria Joao
    Gaspar, Maria Augusta
    Pereira, Machado
    Barata, Jose Diogo
    Mendes, Miguel
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 29 : 9 - 9
  • [23] Pharmacotherapy follow-up of renal transplanted patients with hypercalcemia treated with Cinacalcet
    Chemello, Clarice
    Aguilera, Margarita
    Calleja Hernandez, Miguel Angel
    Faus Dader, Maria Jose
    Jimenez Morales, Alberto
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 2009, 31 (02): : 293 - 293
  • [24] Unexplained pulmonary hypertension in older patients: Clinical characteristics, follow-up, and prognosis
    Yigla, M
    Azzam, Z
    Rinkevich, D
    Rubin, AHE
    Reisner, SA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND PROCEDURES, 1997, 14 (01): : 9 - 15
  • [25] HEMODYNAMIC FOLLOW-UP OF TREATED HYPERTENSION WITH DOPPLER ULTRASOUND
    LARSON, JD
    DUSTAN, HP
    FLOYD, ZE
    OPARIL, S
    CIRCULATION, 1983, 68 (04) : 345 - 345
  • [26] Opportunistic Screening for Atrial Fibrillation During Follow-Up of Patients With Treated Hypertension
    Jolobe, Oscar M. P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2014, 16 (08): : 612 - 612
  • [27] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF TREATED AND UNTREATED HYPERPROLACTINAEMIC WOMEN
    KERMANS, G
    DHONT, M
    DEBRUYNE, G
    VANDEKERCKHOVE, D
    HORMONE RESEARCH, 1985, 22 (03) : 250 - 251
  • [28] Long-term follow-up of left ventricular remodeling in treated and untreated hypertensive patients
    Conrady, AO
    Rudomanov, OG
    Zakharov, DV
    Ovchinnicova, OA
    Vahrameeva, NV
    Krutikov, AN
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 : S181 - S182
  • [29] ISOLATED SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION - LOWERING THE RISK OF STROKE IN OLDER PATIENTS
    PETROVITCH, H
    VOGT, TM
    BERGE, KG
    GERIATRICS, 1992, 47 (03) : 30 - &