Analogies between the Crossing Number and the Tangle Crossing Number

被引:0
|
作者
Anderson, Robin [1 ]
Bai, Shuliang [2 ]
Barrera-Cruz, Fidel
Czabarka, Eva [2 ,9 ]
Da Lozzo, Giordano [3 ]
Hobson, Natalie L. F. [4 ]
Lin, Jephian C-H [5 ]
Mohr, Austin [6 ]
Smith, Heather C. [7 ,8 ]
Szekely, Laszlo A. [2 ,9 ]
Whitlatch, Hays [2 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Dept Math, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Dept Math, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Rome, Italy
[4] Sonoma State Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Rohnert Pk, CA 94928 USA
[5] Iowa State Univ, Dept Math, Ames, IA USA
[6] Nebraska Wesleyan Univ, Dept Math, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Davidson Coll, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Davidson, NC 28036 USA
[8] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[9] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Pure & Appl Math, ZA-2006 Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF COMBINATORICS | 2018年 / 25卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TREES; GRAPHS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Tanglegrams are special graphs that consist of a pair of rooted binary trees with the same number of leaves, and a perfect matching between the two leaf-sets. These objects are of use in phylogenetics and are represented with straight-line drawings where the leaves of the two plane binary trees are on two parallel lines and only the matching edges can cross. The tangle crossing number of a tanglegram is the minimum number of crossings over all such drawings and is related to biologically relevant quantities, such as the number of times a parasite switched hosts. Our main results for tanglegrams which parallel known theorems for crossing numbers are as follows. The removal of a single matching edge in a tanglegram with n leaves decreases the tangle crossing number by at most n - 3, and this is sharp. Additionally, if gamma(n) is the maximum tangle crossing number of a tanglegram with n leaves, we prove 1/2 ((n)(2)) (1-o(1)) <= gamma(n) < 1/2 ((n)(2)). For an arbitrary tanglegram T, the tangle crossing number, crt(T), is NP-hard to compute (Fernau et al. 2005). We provide an algorithm which lower bounds crt(T) and runs in O(n(4)) time. To demonstrate the strength of the algorithm, simulations on tanglegrams chosen uniformly at random suggest that the tangle crossing number is at least 0.055n(2) with high probabilty, which matches the result that the tangle crossing number is Theta(n(2)) with high probability (Czabarka et al. 2017).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Odd crossing number is not crossing number
    Pelsmajer, MJ
    Schaefer, M
    Stefankovic, D
    GRAPH DRAWING, 2006, 3843 : 386 - 396
  • [2] Odd Crossing Number and Crossing Number Are Not the Same
    Michael J. Pelsmajer
    Marcus Schaefer
    Daniel Štefankovič
    Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2008, 39 : 442 - 454
  • [3] Odd crossing number and crossing number are not the same
    Pelsmajer, Michael J.
    Schaefer, Marcus
    Stefankovic, Daniel
    DISCRETE & COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY, 2008, 39 (1-3) : 442 - 454
  • [4] Crossing number, pair-crossing number, and expansion
    Kolman, P
    Matousek, J
    JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY SERIES B, 2004, 92 (01) : 99 - 113
  • [5] ON AN INEQUALITY BETWEEN UNKNOTTING NUMBER AND CROSSING NUMBER OF LINKS
    Hanaki, Ryo
    Kanadome, Junsuke
    JOURNAL OF KNOT THEORY AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS, 2010, 19 (07) : 893 - 903
  • [6] Crossing Number and Weighted Crossing Number of Near-Planar Graphs
    Cabello, Sergio
    Mohar, Bojan
    ALGORITHMICA, 2011, 60 (03) : 484 - 504
  • [7] Crossing Number and Weighted Crossing Number of Near-Planar Graphs
    Sergio Cabello
    Bojan Mohar
    Algorithmica, 2011, 60 : 484 - 504
  • [8] Note on the pair-crossing number and the odd-crossing number
    Toth, Geza
    DISCRETE & COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY, 2008, 39 (04) : 791 - 799
  • [9] Note on the Pair-crossing Number and the Odd-crossing Number
    Géza Tóth
    Discrete & Computational Geometry, 2008, 39 : 791 - 799
  • [10] The Bundled Crossing Number
    Alam, Md. Jawaherul
    Fink, Martin
    Pupyrev, Sergey
    GRAPH DRAWING AND NETWORK VISUALIZATION (GD 2016), 2016, 9801 : 399 - 412