Nipple sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients and long-term survival outcomes: An analysis of the SEER database

被引:27
|
作者
Li, Mingzhu [1 ]
Chen, Kai [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Fengtao [2 ,3 ]
Su, Fengxi [2 ,3 ]
Li, Shunrong [2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Liling [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Quanzhou Hosp 1, Quanzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Malignant Tumor Epigenet &, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Breast Tumor Ctr, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Biostat, Yale Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CONSERVING SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; ONCOLOGICAL SAFETY; RECONSTRUCTION; EXPERIENCE; INVOLVEMENT; POPULATION; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0183448
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the prevalence of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and its long-term survival outcomes in breast cancer patients. Method We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and identified 2,440 breast cancer patients who received NSM during 1998-2013. We used chi-square and binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with the use of radiotherapy after NSM. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). We used the log-rank test and Cox regression to identify factors associated with CSS and OS. Results The median age of the population was 50 years. There were 725 (29.7%), 1064 (43.6%) and 651 (26.7%) patients who had Tis, T1 and T2-3 disease and 1943 (79.6%), 401 (16.4%) and 96 (3.9%) patients who had N0, N1 and N2-3 disease, respectively. The rates of RT use were 61.4%, 39.6% and 10.9% in patients with N2-3 disease, N1 or T3/N0 disease and Tis/ T1-2N0 disease, respectively. Elderly age, African American race, and higher T-stage and N-stage were associated with receiving radiotherapy. For patients diagnosed between 1998-2010 (N = 763), the median follow-up was 69 months. The 5-and 10-yr CSS were 96.9% and 94.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-yr OS were 94.1% and 88.0%, respectively. Ethnicity, T-stage and N-stage were factors independently associated with CSS, and age and T-stage were factors independently associated with OS. Conclusions The use of NSM has increased, and it is oncologically safe for breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Increase in Utilization of Nipple Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Indications, Complications, and Oncologic Outcomes
    Muhsen, S.
    Moo, T.
    Zabor, E.
    Stempel, M.
    Pusic, A. L.
    Gemignani, M. L.
    Morrow, M.
    Sacchini, V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : S104 - S104
  • [32] Feasibility study of nipple-sparing mastectomy for Japanese breast cancer patients
    Takahashi, Maiko
    Jinno, Hiromitsu
    Hayashida, Tetsu
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (27)
  • [33] Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy
    Janssen, Stefan
    Holz-Sapra, Edna
    Rades, Dirk
    Moser, Alexander
    Studer, Gabriela
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 9 (06) : 2435 - 2441
  • [34] Oncologic Reliability of Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for Selected Patients with Breast Cancer
    Rulli, Antonio
    Caracappa, Daniela
    Barberini, Francesco
    Boselli, Carlo
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Castellani, Elisa
    Noya, Giuseppe
    Covarelli, Piero
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2013, 27 (03): : 387 - 394
  • [35] Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Short- and Long-term Patient Satisfaction Results
    Kelly, Bridget
    Korotkin, Jenna
    Smith, Barbara
    Faulkner, Heather
    Specht, Michelle
    Gadd, Michele
    Hughes, Kevin
    Oseni, T. Salewa
    Colwell, Amy
    Coopey, Suzanne
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (SUPPL 2) : S282 - S284
  • [36] Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option?
    Cense, HA
    Rutgers, EJT
    Cardozo, ML
    Van Lanschot, JJB
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (06): : 521 - 526
  • [37] Nipple Sparing Mastectomy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Mota, B. S.
    Rieira, R.
    Atallah, A. N.
    Bevilacqua, J. B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : S73 - S73
  • [38] Nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a short term analysis of our experience
    Psaila, A.
    Pozzi, M.
    Adesi, L. Barone
    Varanese, A.
    Costantini, M.
    Gullo, P.
    Panimolle, M.
    Pugliese, P.
    Botti, C.
    Di Filippo, F.
    De Vita, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 25 (03): : 309 - 312
  • [39] Contralateral prophylactic nipple sparing mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer
    Grube, B.
    Tran, E.
    Killelea, B.
    Tavassoli, F.
    Lannin, D.
    Keleifa, S.
    [J]. BREAST, 2011, 20 : S52 - S53
  • [40] Oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in young patients with breast cancer compared with conventional mastectomy
    Huang, Jiapeng
    Mo, Qinguo
    Zhuang, Yaqiang
    Qin, Qinghong
    Huang, Zhen
    Mo, Junyang
    Tan, Qixing
    Lian, Bin
    Cao, Yiming
    Qin, Shuting
    Wei, Changyuan
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (04) : 4813 - 4820