Kinematics and kinetics of the drive off the front foot in cricket batting

被引:40
|
作者
Stretch, R
Buys, F
Du Toit, E
Viljoen, G
机构
[1] Univ Port Elizabeth, Sport Bur, ZA-6000 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[2] Univ Port Elizabeth, Dept Human Movement Sci, ZA-6000 Port Elizabeth, South Africa
关键词
cinematography; cricket; grip pressure; kinematics; kinetics;
D O I
10.1080/026404198366344
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
A cinematographic analysis of the drive off the front foot (D) and the forward defensive stroke (FD) was undertaken to establish the kinematic and kinetic factors involved in playing these strokes against medium-fast bowling. Fourteen provincial cricket batsmen were filmed at 100 Hz while batting on a turf pitch with a specially instrumented bat. Results for the drive off the front foot revealed that the movement and stroke pattern were generally supportive of the coaching literature, with the forward defensive stroke forming the basis of the drive. Certain mechanical differences, although non-significant, were evident to facilitate the attacking nature of the front foot drive and included a higher backlift (FD = 0.65 m; D = 0.74 m), later commencement of the stride (FD = 0.64 s pre-impact; D = 0.58 s pre-impact) and downswing of the bat (FD = 0.38 s pre-impact; D = 0.36 s pre-impact), a shorter front foot stride (FD = 0.72 m; D = 0.68 m) with the front foot placement taking place later (FD = 0.14 s pre-impact; D = 0.06 s pre-impact), and the back foot dragging further forward at impact (FD = 0.05 m; D = 0.10 m). The front upper limb moved as a multi-segmental series of levers, which resulted in the drive showing significantly greater (P < 0.05) peak bat horizontal velocity at 0.02 s pre impact (FD = 3.53 +/- 3.44 m.s(-1); D = 11.8 +/- 4.61 m.s(-1)) and 0.02 s post-impact (FD = 2.73 +/- 2.88 m.s(-1); D = 11.3 +/- 4.21 m.s(-1)). The drive showed a significantly greater (P < 0.05) bat-ball closing horizontal velocity (FD = 24.2 +/- 4.65 m.s(-1); D = 32.3 +/- 5.06 m.s(-1)) and post-impact ball horizontal velocity (FD = 6.85 +/- 5.12 m.s(-1); D = 19.5 +/- 2.13 m.s(-1)) than for the forward defensive stroke. The point of bat-ball contact showed nonsignificant differences, but occurred further behind the front ankle (FD = 0.09 +/- 0.17 m; D = 0.20 +/- 0.13 m), with the bat more vertical at impact (FD = 62.6 +/- 6.53 degrees; D = 77.8 +/- 7.05 degrees). Significant differences (P < 0.01) occurred between the grip forces of the top and bottom hands for the two strokes, with the principal kinetic finding that the top hand plays the dominant role during the execution of the drive with the bottom hand reinforcing it at impact. Similar grip force patterns for the two strokes occurred during the initial part of the stroke, with the drive recording significantly greater (P < 0.05) forces at 0.02 s pre-impact (top hand: FD = 129 +/- 41.6 N; D = 199 +/- 40.9 N; bottom hand: FD = 52.2 +/- 16.9 N; D = 91.8 +/- 41.1 N), at impact (top hand: FD = 124 +/- 29.3 N; D = 158 +/- 56.2 N; bottom hand: FD = 67.1 +/- 21.5 N; D = 86.2 +/- 58.2 N) and 0.02 s postimpact (top hand: FD = 111 +/- 22.2 N; D = 126 +/- 28.5 N; bottom hand: FD = 65.5 +/- 26.9 N; D = 82.4 +/- 28.6 N).
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 720
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Midfoot passive stiffness affects foot and ankle kinematics and kinetics during the propulsive phase of walking
    Magalhaes, Fabricio Anicio
    Fonseca, Sergio Teixeira
    Araujo, Vanessa Lara
    Trede, Renato Guilherme
    Oliveira, Lilian Marques
    Miranda E Castor, Camila Gomes
    Pinto, Rafael Zambelli
    Souza, Thales Rezende
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 119
  • [42] Foot-Ball Impact Effects on Kinematics and Kinetics During Free Kick Execution in Soccer
    Pablo Angel-Lopez, Juan
    Braidot, Ariel
    ADVANCES IN BIOENGINEERING AND CLINICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 1, SABI 2023, 2024, 106 : 396 - 412
  • [43] The effect of foot position on hip and ankle kinematics and kinetics during walking in static calibration trials
    Althomali, Omar W.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 177
  • [44] Biomechanical variations in patients with flatfoot deformity: Impact of gender, age, and BMI on foot kinetics and kinematics
    Patil, Mrudula
    Kulkarni, Mrudula S.
    Sinha, Avijan
    Ghorpade, Ratnakar R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 57 : 90 - 97
  • [45] Consistent immediate effects of foot orthoses on comfort and lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity
    Mündermann, A
    Nigg, BM
    Humble, RN
    Stefanyshyn, DJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 20 (01) : 71 - 84
  • [46] Influence and benefits of foot orthoses on kinematics, kinetics and muscle activation during step descent task
    Bonifacio, Douglas
    Richards, Jim
    Selfe, James
    Curran, Sarah
    Trede, Renato
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 65 : 106 - 111
  • [47] Segmented Forefoot Plate in Basketball Footwear: Does it Influence Performance and Foot Joint Kinematics and Kinetics?
    Lam, Wing-Kai
    Lee, Winson Chiu-Chun
    Lee, Wei Min
    Ma, Christina Zong-Hao
    Kong, Pui Wah
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 34 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [48] Effect of orthopedic insoles on lower limb motion kinematics and kinetics in adults with flat foot: a systematic review
    Chen, Hairong
    Sun, Dong
    Fang, Yufei
    Gao, Shunxiang
    Zhang, Qiaolin
    Biro, Istvan
    Tafferner-Gulyas, Viktoria
    Gu, Yaodong
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 12
  • [49] Kinematics and kinetics of single-limb heel rise in diabetes related medial column foot deformity
    Hastings, Mary K.
    Woodburn, James
    Mueller, Michael J.
    Strube, Michael J.
    Johnson, Jeffrey E.
    Sinacore, David R.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2014, 29 (09) : 1016 - 1022
  • [50] The effect of increased strength on ball release speed and front foot contact-phase technique in elite male cricket fast bowlers
    Felton, P. J.
    Shine, K. J.
    Yeadon, M. R.
    King, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2025, 43 (10) : 915 - 925