LabRGB : Evaluation of the weighting factors

被引:0
|
作者
Nakaya, Fumio [1 ]
Ohta, Noboru [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuji Xerox Co Ltd, Corp Technol Planning, R&D Management Grp 430, Sakai Nakai, Kanagawa 2590157, Japan
关键词
multispectral; encoding; decoding; color; eigenvector; trigonometric function;
D O I
10.1117/12.838824
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Spectral distribution can be written as a linear combination of eigenvectors and the eigenvectors method gives the least estimation error, but eigenvectors depend on a sample selection of population and encoding values have no physical meaning. Recently reported LabPQR [1] is to convey physical values, but still is dependent on a sample selection of population. Thus, LabRGB [2] was proposed in 2007. LabRGB is to provide "sample selection of population" free spectral encoding/decoding methods. LabRGB consists of six unique trigonometric base functions and physically meaningful encoding values. LabRGB was applied to the real multispectral images and showed almost equal performance to traditional orthogonal eigenvector method in spectral estimation, and even better performance in colorimetric estimation. In this paper, the weighting factors of the base functions were examined in terms of their possible ranges. The numerical values are obtained by using a linear programming technique, and the results are also confirmed by using the Monte Carlo method. The results indicate that the possible ranges of six scores for six base functions are well within -80 to 80. The ranges thus obtained give a good clue for explicitly defining the bit depths of respective scores for the future applications and standardization.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Threading without optimizing weighting factors for scoring function
    Yang, Yifeng David
    Park, Changsoon
    Kihara, Daisuke
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 73 (03) : 581 - 596
  • [42] AGE AND SEX DEPENDENT WEIGHTING FACTORS FOR MEDICAL IRRADIATION
    BENINSON, D
    SOWBY, D
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1985, 11 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [43] On the negative weighting factors in the Muskingum-Cunge scheme
    Szél, S
    Gáspár, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (04) : 299 - 306
  • [44] INSTRUMENT NOISE AND WEIGHTING FACTORS IN DATA-ANALYSIS
    HENEGHAN, SP
    VANGSNESS, M
    [J]. EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 1990, 9 (05) : 290 - 294
  • [45] Water allocation by weighting factors considering multiple criteria
    Yi, CS
    Choi, SA
    Shim, MP
    Kim, HS
    Kim, BS
    [J]. Efficient Use and Management of Urban Water Supply (Efficient 2005), 2005, 5 (3-4): : 105 - 114
  • [46] WEIGHTING FACTORS AND SCALE EFFECTS IN CALCULATION OF COMPETITION COEFFICIENTS
    ARMSTRONG, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1977, 111 (980): : 810 - 812
  • [47] Weighting factors for single-step trapezoidal method
    Zhao, FZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2006, 128 (04): : 409 - 412
  • [48] VALUE AND UNCERTAINTY AS WEIGHTING FACTORS IN IMPRESSION-FORMATION
    RONIS, DL
    LIPINSKI, ER
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 21 (01) : 47 - 60
  • [49] Looking back and forging ahead: the weighting of ESG factors
    Alexandros Garefalakis
    Augustinos Dimitras
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 294 : 151 - 189
  • [50] Predictive Torque and Flux Control Without Weighting Factors
    Rojas, Christian A.
    Rodriguez, Jose
    Villarroel, Felipe
    Espinoza, Jose R.
    Silva, Cesar A.
    Trincado, Mauricio
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2013, 60 (02) : 681 - 690