Oncological safety of autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy for invasive breast cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Geers, Joachim [1 ]
Wildiers, Hans [1 ,2 ]
Van Calster, Katrien [1 ]
Laenen, Annouschka [3 ]
Floris, Giuseppe [1 ,4 ]
Vandevoort, Marc [1 ,5 ]
Fabre, Gerd [1 ,5 ]
Nevelsteen, Ines [1 ,6 ]
Smeets, Ann [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Multidisciplinary Breast Ctr, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Gen Med Oncol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Sint Raphael, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Kapucijnenvoer 35,Blok D,Bus 7001, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Imaging & Pathol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Hosp Leuven, Surg Oncol, Dept Oncol, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
BMC CANCER | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Autologous breast reconstruction; Invasive breast cancer; Tumour dormancy; Surgical stress; Metastases; TUMOR DORMANCY; TIME DISTRIBUTION; SURGICAL STRESS; RECURRENCE; SURGERY; METASTASIS; SURVIVAL; SUPPORT; MODEL; FLAP;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4912-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe number of patients requesting autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) after mastectomy for breast cancer has increased over the past decades. However, concern has been expressed about the oncological safety of ABR. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of ABR on distant relapse.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, data was analysed from patients who underwent mastectomy for invasive breast cancer in University Hospitals Leuven between 2000 and 2011. In total, 2326 consecutive patients were included, 485 who underwent mastectomy with ABR and 1841 who underwent mastectomy alone. The risk of relapse in both groups was calculated using a Cox proportional hazards analysis, adjusted for established prognostic factors. ABR was considered as a time-dependent variable. Additionally, the evolution of the risk over follow-up time was calculated.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 68months, 8% of patients in the reconstruction group developed distant metastases compared to 15% in the mastectomy alone group (univariate HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.97, p=0.0323). However, after adjustment for potential confounding factors in a Cox multivariable analysis, the risk of distant relapse was no longer significantly different between groups (multivariate HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.22, p=0.3301). Moreover, the risk of metastasis after reconstruction was not time-dependent.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that there is no effect of ABR on distant relapse rate and thus that ABR is an oncological safe procedure. The rate of local recurrence was too low to make any significant conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Determining the Oncological Risk of Autologous Lipoaspirate Grafting for Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Gino Rigotti
    Alessandra Marchi
    Paolo Stringhini
    Guido Baroni
    Mirco Galiè
    Anna Maria Molino
    Anna Mercanti
    Rocco Micciolo
    Andrea Sbarbati
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2010, 34 : 475 - 480
  • [32] Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy in Invasive Breast Cancer: Identification of Patients Not Needing Postoperative Radiotherapy
    Moorman, A. M.
    de Leeuw, D.
    Bourez, R. L. J. H.
    Leeksma, N. G.
    Kouwenhoven, E. A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 70
  • [33] Patient reported shared decision making regarding breast reconstruction after mastectomy for invasive breast cancer
    De Ligt, K.
    Van Bommel, A.
    Mureau, M.
    Schreuder, K.
    Peeters, M. J. Vrancken
    Schrieks, M.
    Maduro, J.
    Siesling, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 57 : S71 - S71
  • [34] Oncological outcome after immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer: a long-term study
    Sandelin, K
    Wickman, M
    Billgren, AM
    BREAST, 2004, 13 (03): : 210 - 218
  • [35] Oncological safety and complication risks of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: A Bayesian analysis
    Shen, Zeren
    Sun, Jiaqi
    Yu, Yijia
    Chiu, Chiaoyun
    Zhang, Zhe
    Zhang, Yuanfeng
    Xu, Jinghong
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (02): : 290 - 299
  • [36] Prepectoral versus subpectoral single stage breast reconstruction after conservative mastectomy for breast cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes
    Scardina, L.
    Di Leone, A.
    Salgarello, M.
    Adesi, L. Barone
    Visconti, G.
    Terribile, D.
    Masetti, R.
    Franceschini, G.
    BREAST, 2023, 68 : S107 - S108
  • [37] Nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction after areola-sparing mastectomy
    Opsomer, Dries
    Vyncke, Tom
    Depypere, Bernard
    Stillaert, Filip
    Van Landuyt, Koenraad
    Blondeel, Phillip
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (06): : 1223 - 1228
  • [38] Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer
    Krastev, T. K.
    Schop, S. J.
    Hommes, J.
    Piatkowski, A. A.
    Heuts, E. M.
    van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 (09) : 1082 - 1097
  • [39] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY
    WOLF, LE
    BIGGS, TM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1979, 138 (06): : 777 - 782
  • [40] Breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Weiss, PR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 1997, 3 (06): : 932 - 937