Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer

被引:420
|
作者
Levine, MN
Bramwell, VH
Pritchard, KI
Norris, BD
Shepherd, LE
Abu-Zahra, H
Findlay, B
Warr, D
Bowman, D
Myles, J
Arnold, A
Vandenberg, T
MacKenzie, R
Robert, J
Ottaway, J
Burnell, M
Williams, CK
Tu, DS
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London Reg Canc Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[3] Toronto Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Canc Ctr, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[6] Queens Univ, Natl Canc Inst Canada, Clin Trials Grp, Cent Off, Kingston, ON, Canada
[7] Windsor Reg Canc Ctr, Windsor, ON, Canada
[8] Hop Hotel Dieu, St Catharines, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Manitoba, Hlth Sci Ctr, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[10] Univ Quebec, St Sacrement Hosp, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[11] St John Reg Hosp, St John, NB, Canada
[12] Univ Saskatchewan, Regina Canc Ctr, Regina, SK, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1998.16.8.2651
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophasphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophasphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphamide 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy. Results: The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia war 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group. Conclusion: The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16: 2651-2658. (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2651 / 2658
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of epirubicin and vinorelbine with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer
    Han, S.
    Kwak, K.
    Kim, J.
    Kim, J.
    Park, K.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 3 (02): : 122 - 122
  • [32] CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY WITH CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE METHOTREXATE AND FLUOROURACIL (CMF) FOR BREAST-CANCER
    HOWELL, A
    BUSH, H
    GEORGE, WD
    HOWAT, JMT
    CROWTHER, D
    SELLWOOD, RA
    RUBENS, RD
    HAYWARD, JL
    BULBROOK, RD
    FENTIMAN, IS
    CHAUDARY, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1984, 50 (02) : 253 - 253
  • [33] Primary chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer with bendamustine hydrochloride, methotrexate and fluorouracil versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil
    Ruffert, K
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1998, 123 : 156 - 158
  • [34] Dose-response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer
    Colleoni, M
    Price, K
    Castiglione-Gertsch, M
    Goldhirsch, A
    Coates, A
    Lindtner, J
    Collins, J
    Gelber, RD
    Thürlimann, B
    Rudenstam, CM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 34 (11) : 1693 - 1700
  • [35] Randomized phase II trial of infusional fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide versus infusional fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cisplatin in patients with advanced breast cancer
    Eisen, T
    Smith, IE
    Johnston, S
    Ellis, PA
    Prendiville, J
    Seymour, MT
    Walsh, G
    Ashley, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (04) : 1350 - 1357
  • [36] Dose-intensive epirubicin-based chemotherapy is superior to an intensive intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil regimen in metastatic breast cancer: A randomized multinational study
    Ackland, SP
    Anton, A
    Breitbach, GP
    Colajori, E
    Tursi, JM
    Delfino, C
    Efremidis, A
    Ezzat, A
    Fittipaldo, A
    Kolaric, K
    Lopez, M
    Viaro, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) : 943 - 953
  • [37] ONDANSETRON COMPARED WITH DEXAMETHASONE AND METOCLOPRAMIDE AS ANTIEMETICS IN THE CHEMOTHERAPY OF BREAST-CANCER WITH CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL
    LEVITT, M
    WARR, D
    YELLE, L
    RAYNER, HL
    LOFTERS, WS
    PERRAULT, DJ
    WILSON, KS
    LATREILLE, J
    POTVIN, M
    WARNER, E
    PRITCHARD, KI
    PALMER, M
    ZEE, B
    PATER, JL
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (15): : 1081 - 1084
  • [39] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 DOSE LEVELS OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, METHOTREXATE, AND FLUOROURACIL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    TANNOCK, IF
    BOYD, NF
    DEBOER, G
    ERLICHMAN, C
    FINE, S
    LAROCQUE, G
    MAYERS, C
    PERRAULT, D
    SUTHERLAND, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (09) : 1377 - 1387
  • [40] Randomized phase III trial of adjuvant epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) versus CMF followed by epirubicin in patients with node-negative or 1–3 node-positive rapidly proliferating breast cancer
    Dino Amadori
    Rosella Silvestrini
    Mario De Lena
    Francesco Boccardo
    Andrea Rocca
    Emanuela Scarpi
    Francesco Schittulli
    Mario Brandi
    Roberta Maltoni
    Patrizia Serra
    Riccardo Ponzone
    Nicoletta Biglia
    Lorenzo Gianni
    Amelia Tienghi
    Maria Rosaria Valerio
    Paola Bonginelli
    Laura Amaducci
    Marina Faedi
    Editta Baldini
    Angelo Paradiso
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2011, 125 : 775 - 784