Memory Guides the Processing of Event Changes for Older and Younger Adults

被引:40
|
作者
Wahlheim, Christopher N. [1 ,2 ]
Zacks, Jeffrey M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, 296 Eberhart Bldg,POB 26170, Greensboro, NC 27402 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
change detection; event cognition; interference; memory updating; prediction error; RECURSIVE REMINDINGS; INTENTIONAL USES; LOOKING BACK; PERCEPTION; SEGMENTATION; ORGANIZATION; RECOLLECTION; INTERFERENCE; RECOGNITION; FAMILIARITY;
D O I
10.1037/xge0000458
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Memory for related past experiences can guide current perceptions. However, memory can lead one astray if situational features have changed. Thus, to adaptively use memory to guide perception, one needs to retrieve relevant memories and also to register differences between remembered and current events. Event Memory Retrieval and Comparison Theory proposes that observers associatively activate memories of related previous episodes, and that this guides their ongoing perception. Conflicts between previous and current event features can hurt immediate performance, but if changes are registered and encoded they can lead to highly effective encoding of the prior event, current event, and their relationship. Disruption of these mechanisms could play a role in older adults' greater susceptibility to event memory interference. Two experiments tested these hypotheses by asking participants to watch movies depicting two fictive days of an actor. Some activities were repeated across days, others were repeated with a changed feature (e.g., waking up to an alarm clock or a phone alarm), and others were performed only on Day 2. One week after watching the Day 2 movie, participants completed a cued-recall test. Changes that participants detected but did not remember led to proactive interference in recall, but changes that were successfully detected and remembered led to facilitation. Younger adults detected and remembered more changes than older adults, which partly explained older adults' differential memory deficit for changed activities. These findings suggest a role for episodic reminding in event perception and a potential source of age differences in event memory.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 50
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Attributions of responsibility for memory problems in older and younger adults
    McCracken, JE
    Hayes, JA
    Dell, D
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 1997, 75 (05): : 385 - 391
  • [32] Memory dynamics and decision making in younger and older adults
    Teresa Lechuga, Ma
    Gomez-Ariza, Carlos J.
    Iglesias-Parro, Sergio
    Pelegrina, Santiago
    PSICOLOGICA, 2012, 33 (02): : 257 - 274
  • [33] Influences on the efficiency of prospective memory in younger and older adults
    West, R
    Craik, FIM
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2001, 16 (04) : 682 - 696
  • [34] The effects of sleep on episodic memory in older and younger adults
    Aly, Mariam
    Moscovitch, Morris
    MEMORY, 2010, 18 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [35] Comparative study of memory deficits in younger and older adults
    Najam, Najma
    Noor, Fatima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 468 - 468
  • [36] OLDER AND YOUNGER ADULTS MEMORY FOR STRUCTURED AND UNSTRUCTURED EVENTS
    PADGETT, RJ
    RATNER, HH
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (03) : 133 - 139
  • [37] The Effects of Feedback on Memory Strategies of Younger and Older Adults
    Zhang, Fan
    Zhang, Xin
    Luo, Meng
    Geng, Haiyan
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [38] Working memory capacity differences in older and younger adults
    Brumback, C
    Gratton, G
    Fabiani, M
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 101 - 101
  • [39] Source monitoring and prospective memory in younger and older adults
    Hutchings, Veronica
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2010, 64 (04): : 326 - 326
  • [40] THE ALLOCATION OF CENTRAL PROCESSING CAPACITY IN YOUNGER AND OLDER ADULTS
    LORSBACH, TC
    SIMPSON, GB
    GERONTOLOGIST, 1985, 25 : 230 - 230