CAGE distance framework and bilateral trade flows: case of India

被引:9
|
作者
Tokas, Kalpana [1 ]
Deb, Arnab Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Management Inst, Dept Econ, New Delhi, India
来源
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW | 2020年 / 43卷 / 10期
关键词
International business; Globalization; Cultural distance; Manufacturing sector; Administrative distance; Cross-border trade flows; Economic distance; Geographic distance; Services sector; PSYCHIC DISTANCE; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; GRAVITY; LANGUAGE; DETERMINANTS; INVESTMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MATTERS; MARKETS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/MRR-09-2019-0386
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The paper is in the area of international business and international trade. Specifically, this paper aims to focus on cross-border trade flows of goods and services between India and its partner nations. Design/methodology/approach Using the Cultural, Administrative, Geographic and Economic (CAGE) distance framework (Ghemawat, 2001), this paper provides empirical support for the impact these distance factors exert on the volume of trade in goods and services between countries. The sample used for empirical analysis consists of a set of 62 OECD countries which are involved in trade in goods and services with India over the period 2005 through 2015. This paper estimates a fixed-effects model to provide a comprehensive examination of all the distance factors impacting the bilateral cross-border trade flows of India. Findings The empirical findings in this paper show that different dimensions of the CAGE distances have varied influence on volume of trade flows between India and its trading partners. Also, the extent of this influence is guided by the nature of industries - manufacturing or services. Originality/value Departing from the common practice in the literature, using the trade flow data for both Indian manufacturing and service sectors separately, this paper examines to what extent is the impact of these distance factors industry driven.
引用
收藏
页码:1157 / 1181
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of competing trade regimes on bilateral trade flows: case of Serbia
    Bjelic, Predrag
    Mitrovic, Radmila Dragutinovic
    [J]. ZBORNIK RADOVA EKONOMSKOG FAKULTETA U RIJECI-PROCEEDINGS OF RIJEKA FACULTY OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 30 (02): : 267 - 294
  • [2] On the role of distance for bilateral trade
    Egger, Peter
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2008, 31 (05): : 653 - 662
  • [3] Climate distance and bilateral trade
    Lamonaca, Emilia
    Bozzola, Martina
    Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 237
  • [4] Cultural Distance and Bilateral Trade
    Cyrus, Teresa L.
    [J]. GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (04):
  • [5] DETERMINANTS OF BILATERAL TRADE-FLOWS
    SRIVASTAVA, RK
    GREEN, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (04): : 623 - 640
  • [6] Temporary Migration and Bilateral Trade Flows
    Jansen, Marion
    Piermartini, Roberta
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2009, 32 (05): : 735 - 753
  • [7] BILATERAL TRADE FLOWS AND TRANSPORT COSTS
    GERACI, VJ
    PREWO, W
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1977, 59 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [8] Ethical Distance and Difference in Bilateral Trade
    Ramasamy, Bala
    Yeung, Matthew C. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD INVESTMENT & TRADE, 2012, 13 (03): : 420 - 441
  • [9] Linguistic distance as a determinant of bilateral trade
    Hutchinson, WK
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2005, 72 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [10] Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences?
    Tadesse, Bedassa
    White, Roger
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 17 (02) : 147 - 152