The effects of competing trade regimes on bilateral trade flows: case of Serbia

被引:0
|
作者
Bjelic, Predrag [1 ]
Mitrovic, Radmila Dragutinovic [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Econ, Beograd 11000, Serbia
关键词
Trade regimes; gravity model; trade potentials; panel data; PROPER ECONOMETRIC SPECIFICATION; GRAVITY MODELS; EU ENLARGEMENT; INTEGRATION; EQUATION; LESSONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to investigate the effects of competing trade regimes on Serbian trade with its most significant (traditional) partners, like European Union and CEFTA 2006 signatories, and other untraditional trade partners with favourable trade regime, like the USA. To this end, gravity model with bilateral and time effects is estimated by Hausman-Taylor AR(1) instrumental variable estimator, using panel data on bilateral trade between Serbia and its main trade partners during the period 2001-2010. The results indicate that overall level of development and difference in factor endowments stimulate Serbia's exports, which is in accordance with theoretical foundation that inter-industry trade is predominant in exports of less developed countries. Moreover, competing trade regimes appear as important determinant of Serbia's trade relations, whereas additional liberalization of trade regime with the USA as untraditional trade partner, even asymmetrical to Serbia's favour, cannot divert trade flows from traditional partners in the long-run. This could mean that distance plays more prominent role in bilateral trade than the degree of liberalization of trade regimes in case of Serbia. The result could be due to the contemporaneous effects of trade preferences granted to Serbia by the EU and other CEFTA 2006 signatories, main trading partners of Serbia.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 294
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Stabilizing Effects of International Politics on Bilateral Trade Flows
    Bagozzi, Benjamin E.
    Landis, Steven T.
    [J]. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS, 2015, 11 (02) : 151 - 171
  • [2] CAGE distance framework and bilateral trade flows: case of India
    Tokas, Kalpana
    Deb, Arnab Kumar
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 43 (10): : 1157 - 1181
  • [3] DETERMINANTS OF BILATERAL TRADE-FLOWS
    SRIVASTAVA, RK
    GREEN, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (04): : 623 - 640
  • [4] Temporary Migration and Bilateral Trade Flows
    Jansen, Marion
    Piermartini, Roberta
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2009, 32 (05): : 735 - 753
  • [5] BILATERAL TRADE FLOWS AND TRANSPORT COSTS
    GERACI, VJ
    PREWO, W
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1977, 59 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [6] Trade flows and trade specialisation: The case of China
    Caporale, Guglielmo Maria
    Sova, Anamaria
    Sova, Robert
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 34 : 261 - 273
  • [8] A sensitivity analysis on the impact of regional trade agreements in bilateral trade flows
    Ahcar-Olmos, Jaime
    Rodriguez-Barco, David
    [J]. ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA, 2020, 47 (02): : 193 - 219
  • [9] TRADE REGIMES AND BILATERAL TRADE IN THE EU ENLARGEMENT PROCESS: FOCUS ON THE WESTERN BALKANS
    Dragutinovic-Mitrovic, Radmila
    Bjelic, Predrag
    [J]. ACTA OECONOMICA, 2015, 65 (02) : 249 - 270
  • [10] The Effects of Investment Treaties and Trade Agreements on FDI: The Case of Serbia
    Lee, Han-Sol
    Nenovsky, Nikolay
    Yu, Woosik
    [J]. EASTERN EUROPEAN ECONOMICS, 2024,