Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making

被引:354
|
作者
Zhu, Yuxin [1 ,2 ]
Tian, Dazuo [3 ]
Yan, Feng [2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hydropower & Informat Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Changsha 410007, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
WATER-QUALITY; EUTROPHICATION; INDEX;
D O I
10.1155/2020/3564835
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Entropy weight method (EWM) is a commonly used weighting method that measures value dispersion in decision-making. The greater the degree of dispersion, the greater the degree of differentiation, and more information can be derived. Meanwhile, higher weight should be given to the index, and vice versa. This study shows that the rationality of the EWM in decision-making is questionable. One example is water source site selection, which is generated by Monte Carlo Simulation. First, too many zero values result in the standardization result of the EWM being prone to distortion. Subsequently, this outcome will lead to immense index weight with low actual differentiation degree. Second, in multi-index decision-making involving classification, the classification degree can accurately reflect the information amount of the index. However, the EWM only considers the numerical discrimination degree of the index and ignores rank discrimination. These two shortcomings indicate that the EWM cannot correctly reflect the importance of the index weight, thus resulting in distorted decision-making results.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effectiveness of the Decision-Making Process and Strategic Consensus
    Besler, Senem
    [J]. AMME IDARESI DERGISI, 2009, 42 (02): : 89 - 108
  • [42] The Impact of Intuition on the Effectiveness of Decision-Making Process
    Malewska, Kamila
    Chwilkowska-Kubala, Anna
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 386 - 397
  • [43] Effectiveness of Leadership Decision-Making in Complex Systems
    Hallo, Leonie
    Tiep Nguyen
    Gorod, Alex
    Phu Tran
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2020, 8 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [44] Dynamic multicriteria group decision-making method with automatic reliability and weight calculation
    Du, Yuan-Wei
    Zhong, Jiao-Jiao
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 634 : 400 - 422
  • [45] Hybrid grey multiple attribute decision-making method with partial weight information
    Chen, Xiaoxin
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2012, 41 (5-6) : 611 - 621
  • [46] Effectiveness of interprofessional shared decision-making training: A mixed-method study
    Hsiao, Chih-Yin
    Wu, Jeng-Cheng
    Lin, Pi-Chu
    Yang, Pang-Yuan
    Liao, Faith
    Guo, Shu-Liu
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (11) : 3287 - 3297
  • [47] Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision-making Method with Incomplete Weight Information
    Gong, Yanbing
    Feng, Lanping
    [J]. TENTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I AND II, 2011, : 497 - 502
  • [48] Group decision-making method with trust-based weight and reliability parameters
    Wang, Su -Su
    Du, Yuan -Wei
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2024, 662
  • [49] Composition Method of Weak Decision-Making Evidence Based on Focal Element Weight
    Jia, Jingyuan
    Wang, Bo
    [J]. 2019 CHINESE AUTOMATION CONGRESS (CAC2019), 2019, : 1143 - 1148
  • [50] An Improved Belief Entropy and Its Application in Decision-Making
    Zhou, Deyun
    Tang, Yongchuan
    Jiang, Wen
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2017,