Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Local Intra-arterial Fibrinolysis versus Conservative Treatment, a Multicenter Randomized Trial

被引:200
|
作者
Schumacher, Martin [1 ]
Schmidt, Dieter [2 ]
Jurklies, Bernhard [5 ]
Gall, Christine [3 ]
Wanke, Isabel [4 ]
Schmoor, Claudia [3 ]
Maier-Lenz, Herbert [1 ]
Solymosi, Laszlo [6 ]
Brueckmann, Hartmut [7 ]
Neubauer, Aljoscha S. [8 ]
Wolf, Armin [8 ]
Feltgen, Nicolas [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Clin Neuroradiol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Ophthalmol, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Freiburg, Clin Trials Ctr, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neuroradiol, Essen, Germany
[5] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Ophthalmol, Essen, Germany
[6] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Neuroradiol, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[7] Univ Munich, Dept Neuroradiol, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[8] Univ Munich, Dept Ophthalmol, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[9] Univ Gottingen, Dept Ophthalmol, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
ACUTE ISCHEMIC-STROKE; TISSUE-PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR; VISUAL-ACUITY; INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS; RECANALIZATION; METAANALYSIS; OBSTRUCTION; PROGNOSIS; OUTCOMES; LYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.061
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The reported outcomes of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) with or without treatment vary considerably. Although local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is a promising treatment, outcomes have not been compared in randomized trials. Design: Prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial (the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study) to compare treatment outcome after conservative standard treatment (CST) and LIF for acute nonarteritic CRAO. Participants: Between 2002 and 2007, 9 centers in Austria and Germany recruited 84 patients (40 received CST, 44 received LIF), and data for 82 patients were analyzed. Methods: Patients (age 18-75 years) with CRAO, symptoms for 20 hours or less, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) < 0.5 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) were randomized to the CST or LIF group. Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was BCVA after 1 month; the secondary end point was safety. Results: The mean interval between first symptoms and therapy was 10.99 +/- 5.49 hours (CST) and 12.78 +/- 5.77 hours (LIF). The mean BCVA (logMAR) improved significantly in both groups (CST: -0.44 [standard deviation 0.55]; LIF: -0.45 [standard deviation 0.55]; both P < 0.0001) and did not differ between groups (P=0.69). Clinically significant visual improvement (>= 0.3 logMAR) was noted in 60.0% (CST) and 57.1% (LIF) of patients. Two patients in the CST group (4.3%) and 13 patients in the LIF group (37.1%) had adverse reactions. Because of apparently similar efficacy and the higher rate of adverse reactions in the LIF group, the study was stopped after the first interim analysis at the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. Conclusions: In light of these 2 therapies' similar outcomes and the higher rate of adverse reactions associated with LIF, we cannot recommend LIF for the management of acute CRAO. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1367-1375 (C) 2010 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / U128
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute central retinal artery occlusion
    Zhang, X.
    Ji, X.
    Luo, Y.
    Liu, D.
    Guo, L.
    Wu, H.
    Miao, Z.
    Zhu, F.
    Jiao, L.
    Ding, Y.
    Ling, F.
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 31 (04) : 385 - 389
  • [22] Is local intra-arterial fibrinolysis contraindicated in elderly patients with cerebral artery occlusion?
    M. Schumacher
    S. Kraft
    R. Siekmann
    Neuroradiology, 1998, 40 : 822 - 826
  • [23] Is local intra-arterial fibrinolysis contraindicated in elderly patients with cerebral artery occlusion?
    Schumacher, M
    Kraft, S
    Siekmann, R
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 1998, 40 (12) : 822 - 826
  • [24] Usefulness of intra-arterial fibrinolysis of the ophthalmic artery 8 hours or more after central retinal artery occlusion.
    Weill, A
    Cognard, C
    Piotin, M
    Laloum, L
    Castaings, L
    Moret, J
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1998, 21 (07): : 466 - 470
  • [25] Intra-arterial thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: a systematic review
    Noble, J.
    Weizblit, N.
    Baerlocher, M. O.
    Eng, K. T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 92 (05) : 588 - 593
  • [26] Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis in Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
    Ahn, Seong Joon
    Kim, Jae Min
    Hong, Jeong-Ho
    Woo, Se Joon
    Ahn, Jeeyun
    Park, Kyu Hyung
    Han, Moon-Ku
    Jung, Cheolkyu
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (12) : 7746 - 7755
  • [27] Intra-Arterial Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion
    Sobol, Ethan K.
    Sakai, Yu
    Wheelwright, Danielle
    Wilkins, Carl S.
    Norchi, Amanda
    Fara, Michael G.
    Kellner, Christopher
    Chelnis, James
    Mocco, J.
    Rosen, Richard B.
    De Leacy, Reade A.
    Lema, Gareth M. C.
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 15 : 601 - 608
  • [28] LOCAL FIBRINOLYSIS TREATMENT IN CENTRAL RETINAL ARTERY-OCCLUSION
    ANNONIER, P
    SAHEL, J
    WENGER, JJ
    RIGOLOT, JC
    FOESSEL, M
    BRONNER, A
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1984, 7 (11): : 711 - 716
  • [29] Intra-arterial fibrinolysis for central retinal artery occlusion using small aliquots rather than continuous infusion
    Aldrich, E
    Bahouth, M
    Wityk, R
    Gailloud, P
    Murphy, K
    Miller, N
    STROKE, 2006, 37 (02) : 708 - 708
  • [30] Intra-arterial fibrinolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: Ease of adding "eye attack" to a "brain attack" program
    Aldrich, EM
    Wityk, R
    Silverman, I
    Gailloud, P
    Murphy, K
    Miller, N
    STROKE, 2004, 35 (01) : 294 - 295