Attention, noise, and implications for wildlife conservation and management

被引:88
|
作者
Chan, Alvin Aaden Yim-Hol [1 ]
Blumstein, Daniel T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Anthropogenic noise; Attention; Distraction; Conservation; Management; AREA-RESTRICTED SEARCH; VISUAL-SEARCH; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SUSTAINED ATTENTION; ANTHROPOGENIC NOISE; DIVIDED ATTENTION; LIMITED ATTENTION; AUDITORY DISTRACTION; DISCRIMINATION TASK; PAGURUS-BERNHARDUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2011.01.007
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic stimuli are often viewed as disturbances that directly interfere with signal processing or communication, or directly harm animals. However, such sounds may also distract individuals and thus potentially interfere with their ability to make biologically important decisions about food selection, mate selection, and predator detection. This is because all of these decisions require animals to focus their attention on these tasks and the attention allocated to perceived stimuli is limited. We review the ways that attention is studied, the diversity of taxa in which this cognitive process has been studied, and how stimuli from one modality may interfere with attentional processes in another modality. Such distraction may increase the vulnerability of prey to predators and thus influence predation rates and, ultimately, both the population size, and the effective population size (through differential mortality). Recognizing that distraction is likely to be widespread is the first step towards managing it for wildlife conservation and the management of problem animals. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] WILDLIFE CONSERVATION IN FOREST MANAGEMENT - FINAL DISCUSSION
    不详
    FORESTRY, 1971, : 106 - &
  • [42] The importance of disease management programmes for wildlife conservation
    Acevedo-Whitehouse, K.
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 12 (03) : 185 - 186
  • [43] Variability and Change in Maasai Views of Wildlife and the Implications for Conservation
    David Western
    D. L. Manzolillo Nightingale
    Victor Nyaliki Mose
    Johnson Ole Sipitiek
    Kennedy S. Kimiti
    Human Ecology, 2019, 47 : 205 - 216
  • [44] Implications of Ebola virus disease on wildlife conservation in Nigeria
    Egbetade, Adeniyi Olugbenga
    Sonibare, Adekayode Olanrewaju
    Meseko, Clement Adebajo
    Jayeola, Omotola Abiola
    Otesile, Ebenezer Babatunde
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 22 : 16
  • [45] Variability and Change in Maasai Views of Wildlife and the Implications for Conservation
    Western, David
    Nightingale, D. L. Manzolillo
    Mose, Victor Nyaliki
    Sipitiek, Johnson Ole
    Kimiti, Kennedy S.
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2019, 47 (02) : 205 - 216
  • [46] Wildlife forensics: A boon for species identification and conservation implications
    Gouda, Sushanto
    Kerry, Rout George
    Das, Angshuman
    Chauhan, Netrapal Singh
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 317
  • [47] Forest loss and fragmentation in the Amazon: implications for wildlife conservation
    Laurance, WF
    Vasconcelos, HL
    Lovejoy, TE
    ORYX, 2000, 34 (01) : 39 - 45
  • [48] Decline of oak forests and implications for forest wildlife conservation
    Rodewald, AD
    NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2003, 23 (04) : 368 - 371
  • [49] Categorizing wildlife responses to urbanization and conservation implications of terminology
    Fischer, Jason D.
    Schneider, Sarah C.
    Ahlers, Adam A.
    Miller, James R.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) : 1246 - 1248
  • [50] Tropical tree community shifts: Implications for wildlife conservation
    Chapman, Colin A.
    Chapman, Lauren J.
    Jacob, Aerin L.
    Rothman, Jessica M.
    Omeja, Patrick
    Reyna-Hurtado, Rafael
    Hartter, Joel
    Lawes, Michael J.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (02) : 366 - 374