Family Understanding of Seriously-ill Patient Preferences for Family Involvement in Healthcare Decision Making

被引:40
|
作者
Sharma, Rashmi K. [1 ]
Hughes, Mark T. [2 ,3 ]
Nolan, Marie T. [3 ,4 ]
Tudor, Carrie [4 ]
Kub, Joan [4 ]
Terry, Peter B. [2 ,3 ]
Sulmasy, Daniel P. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Div Hosp Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Div Sch, Divin Sch, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
decision making; patient preference; advance care planning; terminal care; SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; TERMINAL DIAGNOSES; MEDICAL DECISIONS; ELDERLY PATIENTS; LIFE; END; ACCURACY; PREDICTIONS; SURROGATES;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-011-1717-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surrogate accuracy in predicting patient treatment preferences (i.e., what patients want) has been studied extensively, but it is not known whether surrogates can predict how patients want loved ones to make end-of-life decisions on their behalf. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of family members to correctly identify the preferences of seriously-ill patients regarding family involvement in decision making. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five pancreatic cancer and 27 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and their family members (52 dyads total). MAIN MEASURES: Patients and family members completed the Decision Control Preferences (DCP) scale regarding patient preferences for family involvement in health care decisions using conscious and unconscious scenarios. KEY RESULTS: Patient and family member agreement was 56% (29/52 dyads) for the conscious scenario (kappa 0.29) and 46% (24/52 dyads) for the unconscious scenario (kappa 0.15). Twenty-four family members identified the patient's preference as independent in the unconscious scenario, but six of these patients actually preferred shared decision making and six preferred reliant decision making. In the conscious scenario, preference for independent decision making was associated with higher odds of patient-family agreement (AOR 5.28, 1.07-26.06). In the unconscious scenario, cancer patients had a higher odds of agreement than ALS patients (AOR 3.86; 95% CI 1.02-14.54). CONCLUSION: Family members were often unable to correctly identify patient preferences for family involvement in end-of-life decision making, especially when patients desired that decisions be made using the best-interest standard. Clinicians and family members should consider explicitly eliciting patient preferences for family involvement in decision making. Additional research is still needed to identify interventions to improve family member understanding of patient preferences regarding the decision-making process itself.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 886
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Some Unresolved Ethical Challenges in Healthcare Decision-Making: Navigating Family Involvement
    Menon, Sumytra
    Entwistle, Vikki A.
    Campbell, Alastair, V
    van Delden, Johannes J. M.
    [J]. ASIAN BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2020, 12 (01) : 27 - 36
  • [12] Some Unresolved Ethical Challenges in Healthcare Decision-Making: Navigating Family Involvement
    Sumytra Menon
    Vikki A. Entwistle
    Alastair V. Campbell
    Johannes J. M. van Delden
    [J]. Asian Bioethics Review, 2020, 12 : 27 - 36
  • [13] The continency of patient preferences for involvement in health decision making
    Ryan, John
    Sysko, James
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [14] Patient and family involvement in decision making for management of cancer patients at a centre in Singapore
    Chong, Jia An
    Quah, Yan Ling
    Yang, Grace Meijuan
    Menon, Sumytra
    Krishna, Lalit Kumar Radha
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 5 (04) : 420 - 426
  • [15] Shared decision-making in dementia: A review of patient and family carer involvement
    Miller, Lyndsey M.
    Whitlatch, Carol J.
    Lyons, Karen S.
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 15 (05): : 1141 - 1157
  • [16] Factors that influence family and parental preferences and decision making for unscheduled paediatric healthcare – systematic review
    E. Nicholson
    T. McDonnell
    A. De Brún
    M. Barrett
    G. Bury
    C. Collins
    C. Hensey
    E. McAuliffe
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [17] Factors that influence family and parental preferences and decision making for unscheduled paediatric healthcare - systematic review
    Nicholson, E.
    McDonnell, T.
    De Brun, A.
    Barrett, M.
    Bury, G.
    Collins, C.
    Hensey, C.
    McAuliffe, E.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [18] Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: A qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences
    Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah
    Butow, Phyllis
    Bu, Stella
    Charles, Cathy
    Gafni, Amiram
    Fisher, Alana
    Juraskova, Ilona
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2016, 99 (07) : 1146 - 1155
  • [19] Why Not Ask?Measuring Patient Preferences for Healthcare Decision Making
    F. Reed Johnson
    [J]. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2008, 1 : 245 - 248
  • [20] Why Not Ask? Measuring Patient Preferences for Healthcare Decision Making
    Johnson, F. Reed
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (04): : 245 - 248