Phantom subsurface targets in ground-penetrating radar data

被引:3
|
作者
Diamanti, Nectaria [1 ]
Annan, A. Peter [2 ]
Vargemezis, Georgios [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Geophys, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Sensors & Software Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada
关键词
RADIATION-PATTERNS; WAVE-PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1190/geo2021-0692.1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been a very effective tool for exploring the subsurface and the nondestructive testing of nonmetallic structures for the past 40-50 years. The traditional GPR data interpretation is built upon the innate bias that all signals emanate from within the ground and most GPR users are normally under the impression that energy mostly travels straight down leading to the perception that "targets" are beneath the measurement location. The response of features at the ground surface and above ground also is present in most data but not always consciously noted as contributing to the measurements. One class of responses from above-ground features is routinely called "airwaves" because they normally exhibit moveout velocities of air. Often, an above-ground source is not the first thing that comes to mind during data interpretation, unless the user is experienced. Even experienced users can occasionally be misled, as above-ground features are expected to reach the GPR receiver with the moveout velocity of air. Recent experience in some of our surveys has created concerns because the targets at or above the ground surface demonstrated ground wave moveout velocity, which eliminates one of the diagnostic tools. This paper explores this issue, identifies GPR signal paths, and suggests key factors to consider in field operations and data interpretation. To demonstrate the concepts described, we have used numerical modeling and field data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:WB31 / WB40
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reconstructing properties of subsurface from ground-penetrating radar data
    Zhou, Hui
    Qiu, Dongling
    Takenaka, Takashi
    [J]. PIERS 2007 BEIJING: PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM, PTS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 761 - +
  • [2] Optimized SVD Approach for the Detection of Weak Subsurface Targets From Ground-Penetrating Radar Data
    Grzegorczyk, Tomasz M.
    Zhang, Beijia
    Cornick, Matthew T.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (03): : 1635 - 1642
  • [3] IDENTIFICATION OF SUBSURFACE DRAIN LOCATIONS WITH GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR
    CHOW, TL
    REES, HW
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1989, 69 (02) : 223 - 234
  • [4] GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR AS A SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL SENSING TOOL
    PETERS, L
    DANIELS, JJ
    YOUNG, JD
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1994, 82 (12) : 1802 - 1822
  • [5] Subsurface surveying by a rover equipped with ground-penetrating radar
    Barfoot, TD
    D'Eleuterio, GMT
    Annan, AP
    [J]. IROS 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2003, : 2541 - 2546
  • [6] Ground-penetrating radar monitoring of fast subsurface processes
    Allroggen, Niklas
    Beiter, Daniel
    Tronicke, Jens
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 85 (03) : A19 - A23
  • [7] Subsurface imaging using ground-penetrating radar measurements
    Goodman, N
    Leuschen, C
    Plumb, R
    Allen, C
    [J]. IGARSS '96 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM: REMOTE SENSING FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, VOLS I - IV, 1996, : 2036 - 2037
  • [8] Remigration of ground-penetrating radar data
    Jaya, MS
    Botelho, MA
    Hubral, P
    Liebhardt, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1999, 41 (01) : 19 - 30
  • [9] SUBSURFACE DESCRIPTIONS BY GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR FOR WATERSHED DELINEATION
    ASMUSSEN, LE
    PERKINS, HF
    ALLISON, HD
    [J]. GEORGIA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1986, (340): : 1 - 15
  • [10] Correlation between Color of Subsurface Soil Horizons and Ground-Penetrating Radar Data
    Voronin, A. Ya.
    Savin, I. Yu.
    [J]. EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2020, 53 (08) : 1119 - 1131