Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

被引:15
|
作者
Zhou, Xianghong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ning, Qingyang [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Jin, Kun [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Tao [6 ]
Ma, Xuelei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Dept Urol, Inst Urol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, Ctr Biomed Big Data, West China Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Med, Chengdu, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Nomogram; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; RISK; RADIOTHERAPY; IDENTIFICATION; RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-020-6565-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background For selected locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients, radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the first-line treatments. We aimed to develop a preoperative nomogram to identify what kinds of patients can get the most survival benefits after RP. Methods We conducted analyses with data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Covariates used for analyses included age at diagnosis, marital status, race, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th TNM stage, Prostate specific antigen, Gleason biopsy score (GS), percent of positive cores. We estimated the cumulative incidence function for cause-specific death. The Fine and Gray's proportional subdistribution hazard approach was used to perform multivariable competing risk analyses and reveal prognostic factors. A nomogram was built by these factors (including GS, percent of positive cores and N stage) and validated by concordance index and calibration curves. Risk stratification was established based on the nomogram. Results We studied 14,185 patients. N stage, GS, and percent of positive cores were the independent prognostic factors used to construct the nomogram. For validating, in the training cohort, the C-index was 0.779 (95% CI 0.736-0.822), and in the validation cohort, the C-index was 0.773 (95% CI 0.710-0.836). Calibration curves showed that the predicted survival and actual survival were very close. The nomogram performed better over the AJCC staging system (C-index 0.779 versus 0.764 for training cohort, and 0.773 versus 0.744 for validation cohort). The new stratification of risk groups based on the nomogram also showed better discrimination than the AJCC staging system. Conclusions The preoperative nomogram can provide favorable prognosis stratification ability to help clinicians identify patients who are suitable for surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy
    Porter, Christopher R.
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Hutterer, Georg C.
    Kodama, Koichi
    Gibbons, Robert P.
    Correa, Roy, Jr.
    Perrotte, Paul
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [22] Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Early Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Walz, Jochen
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Saad, Fred
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 601 - 607
  • [23] Nomogram predicting survival to assist decision-making of radical prostatectomy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer
    Wu, Kan
    Tang, Yongquan
    Shao, Yanxiang
    Li, Xiang
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (02) : 879 - +
  • [24] Preoperative nomogram for overall 10-year survival after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Duan, Jessica J.
    Piccirillo, Jay F.
    Vlahiotis, Anna
    Luly, Jason R.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 491 - 491
  • [25] EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF A MODEL PREDICTING SURVIVAL OF MEN WITH RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Tian, Zhe
    Moschini, Marco
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karnes, Jeffrey R.
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E99 - E99
  • [26] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: SURVIVAL ANALYSIS AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOME
    Marchioro, Giansilvio
    Volpe, Alessandro
    Vidali, Matteo
    Maso, Gloria
    Zaramella, Stefano
    Tarabuzzi, Roberto
    Varvello, Francesco
    Zacchero, Monica
    De Lorenzis, Elisa
    Frea, Bruno
    Terrone, Carlo
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (04) : 1434 - 1435
  • [27] Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival of advanced breast cancer patients in China.
    Lin, Shaoyan
    Mo, Hongnan
    Li, Yiqun
    Guan, Xiuwen
    Chen, Yimeng
    Wang, Zijing
    Yuan, Peng
    Wang, Jiayu
    Luo, Yang
    Fan, Ying
    Cai, Ruigang
    Li, Qiao
    Chen, Shanshan
    Zhang, Pin
    Li, Qing
    Ma, Fei
    Xu, Binghe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [28] IS THE RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY THE BEST CHOICE FOR PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER?
    Haxhiu, I
    Hyseni, S.
    Osmani, N.
    Elshani, A.
    Haxhiu, A.
    Haxhiu, E.
    Quni, X.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 559 - 560
  • [29] Predicting survival of men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Tian, Zhe
    Moschini, Marco
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Briganti, Alberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 54 : 27 - 34
  • [30] Role of radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer
    Heidenreich, A.
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2011, 78 : S11 - S14