The impacts of the trade liberalization of environmental goods on power system and CO2 emissions

被引:14
|
作者
Hu, Xiurong [1 ]
Pollitt, Hector [2 ,3 ]
Pirie, Jamie [2 ]
Mercure, Jean-Francois [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Junfeng [1 ]
Meng, Jing [5 ]
Tao, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Cambridge Econometr Ltd, Covent Garden, Cambridge CB1 2HT, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Gove, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Dept Geog, Rennes Dr, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England
[5] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 7HB, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental goods agreement; Trade liberalization of environmental goods; E3ME model; Energy technology; Carbon tax; CLIMATE; DECARBONISATION; SECTOR; POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The trade liberalization of Environmental Goods (EG), through as Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA), is crucial in low carbon electricity technology diffusion. However, there is a big gap of the EG definition lists and the integrated effectiveness analysis of EGA. This paper analyses the effects of the trade liberalization of EG based on macroeconomic and electricity sector models and attempts to find a more efficient EG trade policy by comparing different EG lists, considering end-use control and combining the EG policy with a carbon tax. The results show that the trade liberalization of EG does not necessarily benefit the environment without other policies, as the effects of the multiple end-uses of EG on conventional energy might result in environmental damage. We find that merging an EGA into a global carbon tax system would enhance the effects of carbon tax on CO2 reduction by 33%, and simultaneously lower the GDP loss due to the carbon tax by 75%. The economic benefits from the EGA could offset the costs of other environmental policies. Thus, end-use control and other environmental policies should be considered at both the global and regional levels in the setting of international trade agreements that target EG.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effects of Corruption, Renewable Energy, Trade and CO2 Emissions
    Leitao, Nuno Carlos
    [J]. ECONOMIES, 2021, 9 (02)
  • [42] Trade decomposition of CO2 emissions of global construction industries
    Gao, Qun
    Liu, Bin
    Sun, Jide
    Liu, Chunlu
    Xu, Youquan
    [J]. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (01) : 502 - 522
  • [43] The Effects of International Trade on Structural Convergence and CO2 Emissions
    Huebler, Michael
    Bukin, Eduard
    Xi, Yuting
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 83 (03): : 579 - 604
  • [44] The Effects of International Trade on Structural Convergence and CO2 Emissions
    Michael Hübler
    Eduard Bukin
    Yuting Xi
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 83 : 579 - 604
  • [45] CO2 emissions embodied in international trade:: evidence for Spain
    Sánchez-Chóliz, J
    Duarte, R
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (18) : 1999 - 2005
  • [46] CO2 emissions, GDP and trade: a panel cointegration approach
    Cialani, Catia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (03): : 193 - 204
  • [47] The Impacts of Carbon Tax on CO2 Emissions and Macroeconomics in China
    Liang, Wei
    Yang, Ming
    [J]. 3RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (MESS 2017), 2017, 135 : 337 - 342
  • [48] Norwegian gas sales and the impacts on European CO2 emissions
    Berg, E
    Boug, P
    Kverndokk, S
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2001, 23 (04) : 427 - 456
  • [49] Trade liberalization and trade performance of environmental goods: evidence from Asia-Pacific economic cooperation members
    He, Qi
    Fang, Hong
    Wang, Miao
    Peng, Bo
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 (29) : 3021 - 3039
  • [50] Non-separable pollution control: Implications for a CO2 emissions cap and trade system
    Agee, Mark D.
    Atkinson, Scott E.
    Crocker, Thomas D.
    Williams, Jonathan W.
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 36 (01) : 64 - 82