The impacts of the trade liberalization of environmental goods on power system and CO2 emissions

被引:14
|
作者
Hu, Xiurong [1 ]
Pollitt, Hector [2 ,3 ]
Pirie, Jamie [2 ]
Mercure, Jean-Francois [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Liu, Junfeng [1 ]
Meng, Jing [5 ]
Tao, Shu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Cambridge Econometr Ltd, Covent Garden, Cambridge CB1 2HT, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Gove, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Exeter, Dept Geog, Rennes Dr, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England
[5] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 7HB, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental goods agreement; Trade liberalization of environmental goods; E3ME model; Energy technology; Carbon tax; CLIMATE; DECARBONISATION; SECTOR; POLICY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111173
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The trade liberalization of Environmental Goods (EG), through as Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA), is crucial in low carbon electricity technology diffusion. However, there is a big gap of the EG definition lists and the integrated effectiveness analysis of EGA. This paper analyses the effects of the trade liberalization of EG based on macroeconomic and electricity sector models and attempts to find a more efficient EG trade policy by comparing different EG lists, considering end-use control and combining the EG policy with a carbon tax. The results show that the trade liberalization of EG does not necessarily benefit the environment without other policies, as the effects of the multiple end-uses of EG on conventional energy might result in environmental damage. We find that merging an EGA into a global carbon tax system would enhance the effects of carbon tax on CO2 reduction by 33%, and simultaneously lower the GDP loss due to the carbon tax by 75%. The economic benefits from the EGA could offset the costs of other environmental policies. Thus, end-use control and other environmental policies should be considered at both the global and regional levels in the setting of international trade agreements that target EG.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade liberalization in environmental goods
    Wan, Rui
    Nakada, Minoru
    Takarada, Yasuhiro
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 51 : 44 - 66
  • [2] An Empirical Research on Trade Liberalization and CO2 Emissions In China
    Gu, Zusha
    Gao, Ying
    Li, Cong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SYSTEM (ICETIS 2013), 2013, 65 : 243 - 246
  • [3] Trade and transboundary pollution: quantifying the effects of trade liberalization on CO2 emissions
    Hubbard, Timothy P.
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (05) : 483 - 502
  • [4] MODELLING CO2 EMISSIONS IMPACTS ON CROATIAN POWER SYSTEM
    Pasicko, Robert
    Robic, Slavica
    Tomsic, Zeljko
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 14 (03): : 655 - 669
  • [5] Pollution Policy and Trade Liberalization of Environmental Goods
    Nimubona, Alain-Desire
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2012, 53 (03): : 323 - 346
  • [6] Pollution Policy and Trade Liberalization of Environmental Goods
    Alain-Désiré Nimubona
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2012, 53 : 323 - 346
  • [7] Environmental Policy and the CO2 Emissions Embodied in International Trade
    Koutchogna Kokou Edem Assogbavi
    Stéphane Dées
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2023, 84 : 507 - 527
  • [8] Environmental Policy and the CO2 Emissions Embodied in International Trade
    Assogbavi, Koutchogna Kokou Edem
    Dees, Stephane
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2023, 84 (02): : 507 - 527
  • [9] Toward inclusive list-making for trade liberalization in environmental goods to reduce carbon emissions
    Mao, Xiyan
    Liu, Hanyue
    Gui, Jingxuan
    Wang, Peiyu
    [J]. GEOGRAPHY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 4 (03) : 200 - 212
  • [10] The Green Dilemma about Liberalization of Trade in Environmental Goods
    Mathew, Anuj J.
    Fernandez de Cordoba, Santiago
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2009, 43 (02) : 379 - 416