Citizens' perception of modern pig production in Germany: a mixed-method research approach

被引:53
|
作者
Weible, Daniela [1 ]
Christoph-Schulz, Inken [1 ]
Salamon, Petra [1 ]
Zander, Katrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Thunen Inst Market Anal, Braunschweig, Germany
来源
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL | 2016年 / 118卷 / 08期
关键词
Animal husbandry; Citizens' expectations; Pig production; Population groups; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ANIMAL-WELFARE; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; ATTITUDES; FOOD; BEHAVIOR; GAP;
D O I
10.1108/BFJ-12-2015-0458
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose - The wide divergence of the people's expectations and agricultural reality results in conflicts between the agricultural sector and the general public. Contemporary animal husbandry systems are being increasingly critically addressed by media; however, there is no information about peoples' perceptions and attitudes concentrating precisely on specific animal husbandry systems. The purpose of this paper is to explore citizens' perceptions, expectations and main points of criticism in regard to intensive pig production in Germany, and to identify and describe distinct population groups reflecting different attitudes. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed method approach combining qualitative focus groups with a quantitative online survey has been employed. Focus groups capture a wide variety of opinions and concerns in an exploratory manner. Based on these findings, the quantitative survey (n = 1,500 citizens) allowed the identification and characterisation of population groups with identical attitudes regarding pig husbandry. Findings - Qualitative research uncovered a huge range of criticism on pig husbandry, e.g. lack of space, frequency and prophylactic use of medications as well as a lack of care. A relationship was seen between the lack of space, widespread use of medications and behavioural disorders. Consumer preferences for buying cheap meat were believed to be part of the problem since this behaviour fosters the development of larger farms. Quantitative research confirmed the generally critical perception and identified three population groups. Only one third of the population was really concerned about animal husbandry. Younger people and people with better knowledge of agriculture were stronger opponents of intensive pig husbandry. Practical implications - Results indicate that increasing people's knowledge may have an adverse effect on their acceptance of modern farming systems. More communication and better information strategies will probably not improve societal acceptance by itself. Instead, agricultural production systems need to be improved to meet better consumers' expectations whereas communicating these improvements to consumers and the general public in a well-targeted manner will be required as well. Originality/value - When considering options for enhancing public acceptance of modern animal husbandry, a combination of different strategies by different stakeholders is needed. The agricultural sector should improve its communication with the general public and rethink its production practices against the background of public expectations. The government and its agencies urgently need to improve monitoring of the compliance of actual production practices with existing laws and to enforce them. Additionally, adjustments of current regulations of animal husbandry in light of public expectations should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2012
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Moving Towards a Mixed-Method Approach to Educational Assessments
    Sim, Joong Hiong
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2017, 92 (06) : 726 - 726
  • [42] A mixed-method approach to investigate the public acceptance of drones
    Stolz M.
    Papenfuss A.
    de Albuquerque Richers G.C.
    Bahnmüller A.
    Syed A.M.
    Gerndt A.
    Fischer M.
    Wegener J.
    Lieb T.J.
    Biella M.
    [J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2023, 14 (04) : 835 - 855
  • [43] Defining the Phases of Boxing Punches: A Mixed-Method Approach
    Lenetsky, Seth
    Brughelli, Matt
    Nates, Roy J.
    Neville, J. G.
    Cross, Matt R.
    Lormier, Anna V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (04) : 1040 - 1051
  • [44] Qualitative research in physical therapy: a critical discussion on mixed-method research
    Smith, Brett
    Sparkes, Andrew
    Phoenix, Cassandra
    Kirkby, Joanna
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2012, 17 (06) : 374 - 381
  • [45] Evaluating the Disruptiveness of Mobile Interactions: A Mixed-Method Approach
    Mayer, Sven
    Lischke, Lars
    Woiniak, Pawel W.
    Henze, Niels
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [47] Barriers and Facilitators to Research Use Among Allied Health Practitioners: A Mixed-Method Approach to Assessment
    Dunne, Mary
    [J]. EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2011, 6 (04): : 41 - 56
  • [48] Addressing health inequities in Bologna: a mixed-method, multi stakeholder, action-research approach
    Bodini, C.
    Camplone, I.
    Cavazza, G.
    Di Girolamo, C.
    Gentilini, V.
    Marzaroli, P.
    Pandolfi, P.
    Perlangeli, V.
    Pizzi, L.
    Riccio, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [49] A place-based approach for ports' involvement in regional development: A mixed-method research outcome
    Sakalayen, Quazi
    Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling
    Cahoon, Stephen
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 119 : 16 - 31
  • [50] Attitude and perception of gender equity among students and teachers of a rural school in West Bengal: A mixed-method approach
    Jha, Sweety Suman
    Dasgupta, Aparajita
    Paul, Bobby
    Ghosh, Pritam
    Biswas, Aloke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2020, 9 (01)