Can Self-Organizing Maps Accurately Predict Photometric Redshifts?

被引:28
|
作者
Way, M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Klose, C. D.
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Div Space Sci, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[3] Dept Space Phys & Astron, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
DIGITAL SKY SURVEY; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; DATA RELEASE; SDSS; GALAXIES; CATALOG;
D O I
10.1086/664796
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present an unsupervised machine-learning approach that can be employed for estimating photometric redshifts. The proposed method is based on a vector quantization called the self-organizing-map (SOM) approach. A variety of photometrically derived input values were utilized from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey's main galaxy sample, luminous red galaxy, and quasar samples, along with the PHAT0 data set from the Photo-z Accuracy Testing project. Regression results obtained with this new approach were evaluated in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) to estimate the accuracy of the photometric redshift estimates. The results demonstrate competitive RMSE and outlier percentages when compared with several other popular approaches, such as artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression. SOM RMSE results (using Delta z = z(phot) - z(spec)) are 0.023 for the main galaxy sample, 0.027 for the luminous red galaxy sample, 0.418 for quasars, and 0.022 for PHAT0 synthetic data. The results demonstrate that there are nonunique solutions for estimating SOM RMSEs. Further research is needed in order to find more robust estimation techniques using SOMs, but the results herein are a positive indication of their capabilities when compared with other well-known methods.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps
    Bernard Girau
    Cesar Torres-Huitzil
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2020, 32 : 17977 - 17993
  • [22] Fast Self-Organizing Maps Training
    Giobergia, Flavio
    Baralis, Elena
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2019, : 2257 - 2266
  • [23] On the stationarity in some self-organizing maps
    Hoshino, M
    Kimura, Y
    Kaku, I
    ICIM' 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, : 754 - 760
  • [24] Grey self-organizing feature maps
    Hu, YC
    Chen, RS
    Hsu, YT
    Tzeng, GH
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2002, 48 : 863 - 877
  • [25] Document classification with self-organizing maps
    Merkl, D
    KOHONEN MAPS, 1999, : 183 - 195
  • [26] Lateral interactions in self-organizing maps
    Viviani, R
    ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS - ICANN 2002, 2002, 2415 : 920 - 926
  • [27] Initialization Issues in Self-organizing Maps
    Valova, Iren
    Georgiev, George
    Gueorguieva, Natacha
    Olson, Jacob
    COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS: EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR EVOLVING SYSTEMS: SOCIO-TECHNICAL, CYBER AND BIG DATA, 2013, 20 : 52 - 57
  • [28] A Survey of Hardware Self-Organizing Maps
    Jovanovic, Slavisa
    Hikawa, Hiroomi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2023, 34 (11) : 8154 - 8173
  • [29] Fault tolerance of self-organizing maps
    Girau, Bernard
    Torres-Huitzil, Cesar
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (24): : 17977 - 17993
  • [30] Self-organizing maps for representing structures
    Farkas, I
    STATE OF THE ART IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, : 27 - 32