A retrospective, matched case-control study of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist protocol

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Ming-Jer [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Yu-Chiao [1 ,2 ]
Guu, Hwa-Fen [1 ]
Chen, Ya-Fang [1 ]
Kung, Hsiao-Fan [1 ]
Chang, Jui-Chun [1 ]
Chuan, Shih-Ting [1 ]
Chen, Li-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
关键词
controlled ovarian hyperstimulation; recombinant FSH; recombinant LH; human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG); pregnancy; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; HIGHLY PURIFIED HMG; LUTEINIZING-HORMONE; GREATER-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-35; YEARS; STIMULATION; CYCLES; WOMEN; RESPONDERS; EFFICACY; IVF;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2022.931756
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe role of luteinizing hormone (LH) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) requires more evidence for its efficacy. Several studies compared recombinant human LH (r-hLH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) in combination with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (r-hFSH) but lack the results with GnRH-antagonist protocol and in Asians. MethodsThis is a retrospective, single-center study inspecting women receiving GnRH antagonist protocol and r-hFSH+hMG or r-hFSH+r-hLH regimen for over five days for COH in the in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle in Taiwan from 2013 to 2018. The outcomes of IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed after propensity score matching between the two groups. A subgroup analysis was conducted in cycles in which women underwent their first embryo transfer (ET), including fresh ET and frozen ET (FET). ResultsWith a total of 503 cycles, the results revealed that the r-hFSH+r-hLH group performed better in terms of numbers of oocytes retrieved (r-hFSH+hMG vs. r-hFSH+r-hLH, 11.7 vs. 13.7, p=0.014), mature oocytes (8.7 vs. 10.9, p=0.001), and fertilized oocytes (8.3 vs. 9.8, p=0.022), while other outcomes were comparable. The analysis of first ET cycles also showed similar trends. Although the implantation rate (39% vs. 43%, p=0.37), pregnancy rate (52% vs. 53%, p=0.90), and live birth rate (39% vs. 45%, p=0.19) were not significantly different, the miscarriage rate was higher in the r-hFSH+hMG group than the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (26% vs. 15%, p<0.05) in first ET cycles. The cumulative pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the r-hFSH+r-hLH group (53% vs. 64%, p=0.02). No significant difference in rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was observed. ConclusionThe results support the hypothesis that the treatment of r-hLH+r-hFSH improves COH clinical outcomes in the IVF/ICSI cycle.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [41] Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study
    Dong, Mei
    Sun, Li
    Huang, Li
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Xiqian
    Liu, Fenghua
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12