How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience

被引:14
|
作者
Ng, Shu Wen [1 ,2 ]
Colchero, M. Arantxa [3 ]
White, Martin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Carolina Populat Ctr, CB 8120,137 East Franklin St, Chapel Hill, NC 27516 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, CB 7461, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Inst Nacl Salud Publ, Ctr Hlth Syst Res, Univ 655 Colonia Santa Maria Ahuacatitlan, Cuernavaca 62100, Morelos, Mexico
[4] Univ Cambridge, MRC Epidemiol Unit, Ctr Diet & Act Res, Cambridge, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
Sugar-sweetened beverage; Tax; Evaluation; Policy; Logic models; PUBLIC-HEALTH INTERVENTION; NUTRITION RESEARCH; OBESITY; IMPACT; FOOD; CONSUMPTION; INDUSTRY; ASSOCIATION; PROMOTION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-021-11984-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Over 45 jurisdictions globally have implemented sweetened beverage taxes. Researchers and policymakers need to assess whether and how these taxes change beverage demand and supply, their intended and unanticipated health, economic and equity impacts. Lessons from such evaluations can maximise the policies' success and impact on non-communicable disease prevention globally. We discuss key theoretical, design and methodological considerations to help policymakers, funders and researchers commission and conduct rigorous evaluations of these policies and related disease prevention efforts. We encourage involving the perspectives of various stakeholders on what evaluations are needed given the specific context, what data and methods are appropriate, readily available or can be collected within time and budget constraints. A logic model /conceptual system map of anticipated implications across sectors and scales should help identify optimal study design, analytical techniques and measures. These models should be updated when synthesising findings across diverse methods and integrating findings across subpopulations using similar methods.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How should we evaluate a cohort study? Study design
    Klein, R
    Klein, BEK
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (10) : 1533 - 1534
  • [22] How should we evaluate and treat constipation in infants and children?
    Holten, KB
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 54 (08): : 706 - 707
  • [23] How should we evaluate an open artery in STEMI patients?
    Agewall, S
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (07) : 634 - 636
  • [24] CRITICAL CARE - HOW SHOULD WE EVALUATE OUR PROGRESS
    CIVETTA, JM
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (12) : 1714 - 1720
  • [25] How Should We Evaluate Outcomes for Use of Biologics in the Knee?
    LaPrade, Christopher M.
    James, Evan W.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    Engebretsen, Lars
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2015, 28 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [26] How should we evaluate bone mass in children? - Reply
    Clark, Emma M.
    Ness, Andy R.
    Tobias, Jon H.
    Bishop, Nicholas J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 (08) : 1314 - 1314
  • [27] China: How Should Tax Policies Regulate Personal Income Distribution?
    Bao, Lingguang
    INTERTAX, 2005, 33 (03): : 143 - 154
  • [28] How Should We Review Ambulatory EEG ?
    Balaguera, Pedro
    Schuele, Stephan
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
  • [29] How Should We Review Ambulatory EEG ?
    Balaguera, Pedro
    Schuele, Stephan
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
  • [30] How should we model and evaluate breathing interplay effects in IMPT?
    Pastor-Serrano, Oscar
    Habraken, Steven
    Lathouwers, Danny
    Hoogeman, Mischa
    Schaart, Dennis
    Perko, Zoltan
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (23):