Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management Fosters Management-Science Partnerships

被引:56
|
作者
Wilmer, Hailey [1 ]
Derner, Justin D. [2 ]
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E. [3 ]
Briske, David D. [4 ]
Augustine, David J. [5 ]
Porensky, Lauren M. [5 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Northern Plains Climate Hub, 1701 Ctr Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Plains Area Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Cheyenne, WY 82001 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] USDA ARS, Plains Area Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
关键词
adaptive management; bird; decision making; grassland management; grazing management; ranch; shortgrass steppe; social learning; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; CONSERVATION; SYSTEMS; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; COMMUNITY; PERCEPTIONS; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Rangelands of the western Great Plains of North America are complex social-ecological systems where management objectives for livestock production, grassland bird conservation, and vegetation structure and composition converge. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) experiment is a 10-year collaborative adaptive management (CAM) project initiated in 2012 that is aimed at fostering science-management partnerships and data-driven rangeland management through a participatory. multistakeholder approach. This study evaluates the decision-making process that emerged from the first 4 yr of CARM. Our objectives were to 1) document how diverse stakeholder experiences, epistemologies, and resulting knowledge contributed to the CARM project, 2) evaluate how coproduced knowledge informed management decision making through three grazing seasons, and 3) explore the implications of participation in the CARM project for rangeland stakeholders. We evaluated management decision making as representatives from government agencies and conservation non-governmental organizations, ranchers, and interdisciplinary researchers worked within the CARM experiment to 1) prioritize desired ecosystem services; 2) determine objectives; 3) set stocking rates, criteria for livestock movement among pastures, and vegetation treatments; and 4) select monitoring techniques that would inform decision making. For this paper, we analyzed meeting transcripts, interviews, and focus group data related to stakeholder group decision making. We find two key lessons from the CARM project. First, the CAM process makes visible, but does not reconcile differences between, stakeholder experiences and ways of knowing about complex rangeland systems. Second, social learning in CAM is contingent on the development of trust among stakeholder and researcher groups. We suggest future CAM efforts should 1) make direct efforts to share and acknowledge managers' different rangeland management experiences, epistemologies, and knowledge and 2) involve long-term research commitment in time and funding to social, as well as experimental, processes that promote trust building among stakeholders and researchers over time. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 657
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CarpeDiem: Collaborative and Adaptive Recommender for PErsonalized DIEt Management
    Vargiu, Eloisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2021, 21
  • [42] The complex forest: Communities, uncertainty, and adaptive collaborative management
    Doolittle, A. A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (3-4) : 758 - 759
  • [43] Collaborative research partnerships inform monitoring and management of aquatic ecosystems by Indigenous rangers
    Rebecca J. Dobbs
    Christy L. Davies
    Michelle L. Walker
    Neil E. Pettit
    Bradley J. Pusey
    Paul G. Close
    Yoshi Akune
    Ninjana Walsham
    Brendan Smith
    Albert Wiggan
    Preston Cox
    Douglas P. Ward
    Fiona Tingle
    Rod Kennett
    Micha V. Jackson
    Peter M. Davies
    [J]. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2016, 26 : 711 - 725
  • [44] Collaborative research partnerships inform monitoring and management of aquatic ecosystems by Indigenous rangers
    Dobbs, Rebecca J.
    Davies, Christy L.
    Walker, Michelle L.
    Pettit, Neil E.
    Pusey, Bradley J.
    Close, Paul G.
    Akune, Yoshi
    Walsham, Ninjana
    Smith, Brendan
    Wiggan, Albert
    Cox, Preston
    Ward, Douglas P.
    Tingle, Fiona
    Kennett, Rod
    Jackson, Micha V.
    Davies, Peter M.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES, 2016, 26 (04) : 711 - 725
  • [45] Leveraging Collaborative Partnerships to Enhance NWS and Emergency Management Communications through Exercising
    Hogg, David
    Smith, Richard
    Thompson, Jennifer
    Bunker, Ryan
    Huey, Rachael
    Krocak, Makenzie J.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (09) : E1703 - E1710
  • [46] Building unlikely partnerships: Human ecology models for collaborative leadership and the management of complexity
    Koffman, T
    Borden, RJ
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HUMAN ECOLOGY: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY OVERVIEW, 1998, : 11 - 30
  • [47] Using participatory GIS and collaborative management approaches to enhance local actors' participation in rangeland management: the case of Vulindlela, South Africa
    Cho, Matilda Azong
    Onisimo, Mutanga
    Mabhaudhi, Tafazwanashe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (06) : 1189 - 1208
  • [48] Management van partnerships
    Bahlmann, JP
    [J]. ECONOMIST, 2001, 149 (01): : 147 - 149
  • [49] Management Science and the Science of Management
    Hopp, Wallace J.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (12) : 1961 - 1962
  • [50] Ecological Restoration and Control of Rangeland Degradation: Rangeland Management Interventions
    Squires, Victor
    Zhang Degang
    Hua Limin
    [J]. TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE USE OF RANGELANDS IN NORTH-WEST CHINA, 2010, : 81 - 98