Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management Fosters Management-Science Partnerships

被引:56
|
作者
Wilmer, Hailey [1 ]
Derner, Justin D. [2 ]
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E. [3 ]
Briske, David D. [4 ]
Augustine, David J. [5 ]
Porensky, Lauren M. [5 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Northern Plains Climate Hub, 1701 Ctr Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Plains Area Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Cheyenne, WY 82001 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] USDA ARS, Plains Area Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
关键词
adaptive management; bird; decision making; grassland management; grazing management; ranch; shortgrass steppe; social learning; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; CONSERVATION; SYSTEMS; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; COMMUNITY; PERCEPTIONS; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rama.2017.07.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Rangelands of the western Great Plains of North America are complex social-ecological systems where management objectives for livestock production, grassland bird conservation, and vegetation structure and composition converge. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) experiment is a 10-year collaborative adaptive management (CAM) project initiated in 2012 that is aimed at fostering science-management partnerships and data-driven rangeland management through a participatory. multistakeholder approach. This study evaluates the decision-making process that emerged from the first 4 yr of CARM. Our objectives were to 1) document how diverse stakeholder experiences, epistemologies, and resulting knowledge contributed to the CARM project, 2) evaluate how coproduced knowledge informed management decision making through three grazing seasons, and 3) explore the implications of participation in the CARM project for rangeland stakeholders. We evaluated management decision making as representatives from government agencies and conservation non-governmental organizations, ranchers, and interdisciplinary researchers worked within the CARM experiment to 1) prioritize desired ecosystem services; 2) determine objectives; 3) set stocking rates, criteria for livestock movement among pastures, and vegetation treatments; and 4) select monitoring techniques that would inform decision making. For this paper, we analyzed meeting transcripts, interviews, and focus group data related to stakeholder group decision making. We find two key lessons from the CARM project. First, the CAM process makes visible, but does not reconcile differences between, stakeholder experiences and ways of knowing about complex rangeland systems. Second, social learning in CAM is contingent on the development of trust among stakeholder and researcher groups. We suggest future CAM efforts should 1) make direct efforts to share and acknowledge managers' different rangeland management experiences, epistemologies, and knowledge and 2) involve long-term research commitment in time and funding to social, as well as experimental, processes that promote trust building among stakeholders and researchers over time. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 657
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MANAGEMENT SCIENCE OR MANAGEMENT-SCIENCE
    HESSE, R
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1980, 10 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [2] Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Augustine, David J.
    Porensky, Lauren M.
    Wilmer, Hailey
    Derner, Justin D.
    Briske, David D.
    Stewart, Michelle O.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (02):
  • [3] Management-Science and Business-Ethics
    Alan E. Singer
    M. S. Singer
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1997, 16 : 385 - 395
  • [4] Management-science and business-ethics
    Singer, AE
    Singer, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1997, 16 (04) : 385 - 395
  • [5] MANAGEMENT-SCIENCE 10 PAGE CONSTRAINT
    ERLENKOTTER, D
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1976, 22 (05) : 509 - 514
  • [6] Innovation management in collaborative partnerships
    Tarba, Shlomo Y.
    Bauer, Florian
    Weber, Yaakov
    Matzler, Kurt
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [7] A guide to successful management of collaborative partnerships in quantitative research: An illustration of the science of team science
    Platt, Alyssa
    Truong, Tracy
    Boulos, Mary
    Carlson, Nichole E.
    Desai, Manisha
    Elam, Monica M.
    Slade, Emily
    Hanlon, Alexandra L.
    Hurst, Jillian H.
    Olsen, Maren K.
    Poisson, Laila M.
    Rende, Lacey
    Pomann, Gina-Maria
    [J]. STAT, 2024, 13 (02):
  • [8] Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management, Multipaddock Rotational Grazing, and the Story of the Regrazed Grass Plant
    Porensky, Lauren M.
    Augustine, David J.
    Derner, Justin D.
    Wilmer, Hailey
    Lipke, Megan N.
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Briske, David D.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 78 : 127 - 141
  • [9] Collaborative management of public rangeland in Wyoming: Lessons in co-management
    Paulson, DD
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1998, 50 (03): : 301 - 315
  • [10] Adaptive management in the US National Wildlife Refuge System: Science-management partnerships for conservation delivery
    Moore, Clinton T.
    Lonsdorf, Eric V.
    Knutson, Melinda G.
    Laskowski, Harold P.
    Lor, Socheata K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (05) : 1395 - 1402