Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis: a new step in the treatment of slow-transit constipation

被引:31
|
作者
Marchesi, Federico [1 ]
Percalli, Luigi [1 ]
Pinna, Ferdinando [1 ]
Cecchini, Stefano [1 ]
Ricco', Matteo [2 ]
Roncoroni, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Sch Med, Dept Surg Sci, Sect Gen Surg Clin & Surg Therapy, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Parma, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Hyg, I-43100 Parma, Italy
关键词
Constipation; Laparoscopy; Quality of life; Incontinence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CECOPROCTOSTOMY; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-2092-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecorectal anastomosis (SCCRA) has proved to be an effective alternative to total colectomy for the treatment of severe slow-transit constipation. The laparoscopic approach has made this procedure even more attractive. This is the first controlled trial on laparoscopic SCCRA. The study compares the laparoscopic and the open approach. Methods Since 2001, all SCCRAs have been performed laparoscopically at our institution. Only severely symptomatic patients are offered surgery, after stringent patient selection. Laparoscopic SCCRA was performed following the same steps that we first described for the open approach, by utilizing a five-trocar technique. Outcome parameters were prospectively collected every 3 and 6 months. Wexner constipation and incontinence scales (WCS, WI) and gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) were adopted for functional results. We conducted a case-control study of 15 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic SCCRA (VL) and 15 patients previously operated on by the open approach (Op) to compare postoperative and functional outcomes. Results The VL group had better postoperative outcomes (pain, ileus) while complication rates were similar. Resolution of constipation was impressive in both groups, with no significant difference at follow-up. The VL group presented with a higher number of bowel movements at 3 months (3.8 vs. 2.8, p = 0.039), resulting in a significantly higher incontinence rate at 3 months (WI 6.4 vs. 2.73, p = 0.004), although the difference was no longer significant at 1-year follow-up. The quality of life was good for both groups; the VL group showed a significant improvement at 1-year follow-up (64.18 vs. 114.79, p < 0.01). Conclusions Laparoscopic SCCRA confirmed the good functional results of the open approach, with no increase in morbidity rate and a faster postoperative recovery. An early higher incontinence rate did not affect quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:1528 / 1533
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ileorectal intussusception compared to end-to-end ileorectal anastomosis after laparoscopic total colectomy in slow-transit constipation
    Geng, Hong Zhi
    Xu, Chen
    Yu, Yongjun
    Cong, Jiying
    Zhang, Zhao
    Li, Yuwei
    Chen, Qilong
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2024, 61 (06)
  • [42] Laparoscopically assisted subtotal colectomy for slow transit constipation
    Cao, X.
    Jiang, J.
    Suo, J.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2012, 24 : 107 - 107
  • [43] Slow-transit constipation: Evaluation and treatment
    Wong, Shing Wai
    Lubowski, David Z.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (05) : 320 - 328
  • [44] Innovative application of the Versius Surgical System® in subtotal colectomy for refractory slow-transit constipation: A video vignette
    Pecorino, Alice
    Grego, Andrea
    Grossi, Ugo
    Mammano, Enzo
    Passuello, Nicola
    Sarzo, Giacomo
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2025, 27 (02)
  • [45] Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for slow-transit constipationConcerning the paper: Jiang CQ, Qian Q, Liu ZS, Bangoura G, Zheng KY, Wu YH (2008) Subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for selected patients with slow-transit constipation—from Chinese report. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1251–1256
    Renato Costi
    Luigi Roncoroni
    Vincenzo Violi
    Leopoldo Sarli
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 (9) : 1117 - 1118
  • [46] Subtotal colectomy with caeco-rectal anastomosis (Deloyers) for severe slow transit constipation: Comparison with total colectomy
    Costalat, G
    Garrigues, JM
    Didelot, JM
    Yousfi, A
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1997, 51 (03): : 248 - 255
  • [47] Effect of colectomy on gastric emptying in idiopathic slow-transit constipation
    Hemingway, DM
    Finlay, IG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (09) : 1193 - 1196
  • [48] Colectomy for severe slow-transit constipation in strictly selected patients
    Christiansen, J
    Rasmussen, OD
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1996, 31 (08) : 770 - 773
  • [49] Is total colectomy the right choice in intractable slow-transit constipation?
    Ripetti, Valter
    Caputo, Damiano
    Greco, Santi
    Alloni, Rossana
    Coppola, Roberto
    SURGERY, 2006, 140 (03) : 435 - 440
  • [50] Effect of colectomy on gastric emptying in idiopathic slow-transit constipation
    Macdonald, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (05) : 730 - 730