Quantification of MRI-PDFF by complex-based MRI: phantom and rabbit study at 3.0T

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Xiaomin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaojing [1 ]
Ma, Lin [1 ]
Li, Shengli [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ, Sch Med Imaging, Tianjin 300203, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Lab Anim Ctr, Beijing 100069, Peoples R China
关键词
MRI; fat quantification; proton density fat fraction (PDFF); phantom; liver; FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; HEPATIC STEATOSIS; FRACTION; SPECTROSCOPY; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; BIOMARKER; TISSUE; IRON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This paper aimed to evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) in fat-water-iron phantom and rabbit with hepatic steatosis using complex-based chemical shift-encoded MRI technology. Phantoms of varying fat, water and iron content were constructed. Rabbit model with hepatic steatosis was successfully established by high-fat and high cholesterol diet. All MR examinations were performed on a 3.0T MR system. PDFF values of phantoms and rabbits were calculated from IDEAL-IQ. Fat assessment of rabbit liver biopsy was performed as reference standard. MRI-PDFF of four phantom groups with different iron content has no significant difference with the known fat contents (F=0.011, p=1.0), and extremely close correlations were observed (r=0.998, 0.998, 0.999, 0.998, respectively, all p<0.001). The existence of magnetic microspheres in phantoms did not affect fat measurement accuracy. MRI-PDFF showed significant differences between different steatosis grades with medians of 3.72% (normal), 5.43% (mild), 9.11% (moderate) and 11.17% (severe) except normal with mild steatosis. Close correlation between MRI-PDFF and histological steatosis was observed (r=0.78, p<0.01). IDEAL-IQ provides robust and promising fat quantification and can be considered potential alternative to biopsy for chronic patients where available.
引用
收藏
页码:13070 / 13080
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of fat quantification methods: A phantom study at 3.0T
    Bernard, Clare P.
    Liney, Gary P.
    Manton, David J.
    Turnbull, Lindsay W.
    Langton, Christian M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 27 (01) : 192 - 197
  • [2] Simultaneous quantification of hepatic MRI-PDFF and R2* in a rabbit model with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Xiaomin Wang
    Xiaojing Zhang
    Lin Ma
    Shengli Li
    Science China Life Sciences, 2018, 61 : 1107 - 1114
  • [3] Simultaneous quantification of hepatic MRI-PDFF and R2*in a rabbit model with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Wang, Xiaomin
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Ma, Lin
    Li, Shengli
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2018, 61 (09) : 1107 - 1114
  • [4] Simultaneous quantification of hepatic MRI-PDFF and R2* in a rabbit model with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    Xiaomin Wang
    Xiaojing Zhang
    Lin Ma
    Shengli Li
    Science China(Life Sciences), 2018, (09) : 1107 - 1114
  • [5] QUANTIFICATION OF LIVER, PANCREAS, KIDNEY AND VERTEBRAL BODY MRI-PDFF IN NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE
    Idilman, I. S.
    Tuzun, A.
    Savas, B.
    Idilman, R.
    Karcaaltincaba, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 62 : S731 - S731
  • [6] A Standardized Approach for MRI-PDFF is Necessary in the Assessment of Diagnostic Performances of the Ultrasound Based Hepatic Fat Quantification Tools
    Sendur, Aylin Billur
    Sendur, Halit Nahit
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (12) : 3159 - 3161
  • [7] Accuracy of PDFF Estimation by Magnitude-Based and Complex-Based MRI in Children with MR Spectroscopy as a Reference
    Haufe, William M.
    Wolfson, Tanya
    Hooker, Catherine A.
    Hooker, Jonathan C.
    Covarrubias, Yesenia
    Schlein, Alex N.
    Hamilton, Gavin
    Middleton, Michael S.
    Angeles, Jorge E.
    Hernando, Diego
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Schwimmer, Jeffrey B.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (06) : 1641 - 1647
  • [8] Brain MR imaging (MRI) on a high field (3.0T) vertical bore system in comparison to conventional horizontal 3.0T MRI
    Nakada, T
    Fujii, Y
    Matsuzawa, H
    Suzuki, K
    Kwee, IL
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 513 - 513
  • [9] Glioblastoma surgery with and without intraoperative MRI at 3.0T
    Napolitano, M.
    Vaz, G.
    Lawson, T. M.
    Docquier, M-A.
    van Maanen, A.
    Duprez, T.
    Raftopoulos, C.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2014, 60 (04) : 143 - 150
  • [10] Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Initial clinical experience
    Gold, GE
    Suh, B
    Sawyer-Glover, A
    Beaulieu, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (05) : 1479 - 1486