Students tell us what good written feedback looks like

被引:10
|
作者
Voelkel, Susanne [1 ]
Varga-Atkins, Tunde [2 ]
Mello, Luciane, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Life Sci, Crown St, Liverpool L69 7ZB, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Ctr Innovat Educ, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
FEBS OPEN BIO | 2020年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
effective feedback; feedback; feedforward; student perceptions; PERCEPTIONS; ENGAGEMENT; QUALITY; TUTORS;
D O I
10.1002/2211-5463.12841
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Feedback can be an important element of learning, but only if students engage with it. Students are only likely to engage with feedback that they find useful. This study aimed to identify characteristics of written feedback perceived by students as effective. We used a mixed-method approach, integrating quantitative and qualitative data that were collected through the analysis of feedback that was identified by students as good, a student questionnaire, as well as interviews and a focus group exploring students' views on what good feedback looks like. Although the results show that length and composition of 'good' feedback can be extremely variable, some common characteristics could be identified, leading to a set of recommendations for staff marking written assessments. According to students, good feedback should be detailed and specific, and it should tell students how they can improve. Students also find it important that feedback is honest and constructive. In addition, positive reinforcement was identified as important by the focus group, although few examples of good written feedback on the assignment contained any direct praise. Surprisingly, feedforward which might help students in other modules did not feature highly in students' perceptions of good feedback, possibly indicating a focus by students on improving the current assignment rather than on future assignments.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 706
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] This is what COPD looks like
    Sheikh, Khadija
    Coxson, Harvey O.
    Parraga, Grace
    [J]. RESPIROLOGY, 2016, 21 (02) : 224 - 236
  • [32] What science looks like
    [J]. Nature Human Behaviour, 2019, 3 : 763 - 763
  • [33] What Cancer Looks Like
    Evans, Cara
    [J]. DESCANT, 2014, 45 (02): : 87 - 94
  • [34] Is This What Revolution Looks Like?
    Jackson, Ronald L., II
    [J]. DEPARTURES IN CRITICAL QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (04) : 196 - 199
  • [35] This Is What Survival Looks Like
    Wong, Jane
    [J]. YALE REVIEW, 2020, 108 (02): : 41 - 44
  • [36] What He Looks Like
    周云
    [J]. 今日中学生, 2014, (10) : 20 - 21
  • [37] When It Is Not What It Looks Like
    Ahmed, Syed Mustajab
    Saadeh, Basel
    Wander, Praneet
    Islam, Masuma
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S1988 - S1989
  • [38] WHAT THE ATOM LOOKS LIKE
    Compton, Arthur H.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC MONTHLY, 1931, 33 : 550 - 552
  • [39] What science looks like
    不详
    [J]. NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2019, 3 (08) : 763 - 763
  • [40] This Is What Inequality Looks Like
    Pow, Jun Kai
    [J]. BIJDRAGEN TOT DE TAAL- LAND- EN VOLKENKUNDE, 2020, 176 (01): : 177 - 180