Modular proximal femoral replacement in salvage hip surgery for non-neoplastic conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Sewell, Mathew D. [1 ]
Hanna, Sammy A. [1 ]
Carrington, Richard W. [1 ]
Pollock, Robin C. [1 ]
Skinner, John A. [1 ]
Cannon, Stephen R. [1 ]
Briggs, Timothy W. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Natl Orthopaed Hosp, London Bone & Soft Tissue Tumour Serv, Stanmore HA7 4LP, Middx, England
来源
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA | 2010年 / 76卷 / 04期
关键词
proximal femoral replacement; modular; bone loss; infection; loosening; REVISION ARTHROPLASTY; UNCEMENTED REVISION; BONE STOCK; RECONSTRUCTION; ALLOGRAFTS; INFECTION; FAILURE; COMPONENTS; FRACTURES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Addressing severe proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery is a challenging reconstructive problem. The use of modular proximal femoral megaprostheses is one of many available options to address this. This is a retrospective review of 15 patients who had undergone limb salvage at our institution using a modular proximal femoral replacement. There were 8 males and 7 females with a mean age of 67 years (34 to 85) and a mean follow-up of 60 months (1 to 99). indications included re-implantation for deep infection in nine patients, aseptic loosening in three, penprosthetic fracture in two and painful excision arthroplasty in one. Mean Harris hip score increased from 28 (13 to 49) pre-operatively to 69 (39 to 85) at final follow-up (paired t-test, p < 0.0001) and mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score increased from 26% (14 to 40) to 71% (35 to 82) (paired (t-test, p < 0.0001). Prosthesis survival with revision as the endpoint was 87% at 5 years. There were two dislocations (14%) and there was failure to eradicate deep infection in two. Modular proximal femoral replacement provided good function and versatility with an acceptable complication rate for patients with severe proximal femoral bone loss with or without infection.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 502
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Foster Kennedy syndrome associated with non-neoplastic intracranial conditions
    Yaskin, HE
    Schlezinger, NS
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1942, 28 (04) : 704 - 710
  • [32] EXFOLIATIVE CYTOLOGY - A REVIEW OF ITS APPLICATION TO NON-NEOPLASTIC CONDITIONS
    CAMILLER.GE
    LANGE, D
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 1966, 16 (03) : 311 - &
  • [33] Non-neoplastic conditions mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis at CT imaging
    Elmohr, Mohab M.
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1113):
  • [34] Non-neoplastic conditions presenting as soft-tissue tumours
    Crundwell, N.
    O'Donnell, P.
    Saifuddin, A.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 62 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [35] ANEURYSMAL BONE-CYST AND OTHER NON-NEOPLASTIC CONDITIONS
    DAHLIN, DC
    MCLEOD, RA
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1982, 8 (04) : 243 - 250
  • [36] Survivorship, complications, and outcomes following distal femoral arthroplasty for non-neoplastic indications
    Sobol, K. R.
    Fram, B. R.
    Strony, J. T.
    Brown, S. A.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2022, 3 (03): : 173 - 181
  • [37] Non-neoplastic indications and outcomes of the proximal and distal femur megaprosthesis: a critical review
    Vaishya, Raju
    Thapa, Sunil Singh
    Vaish, Abhishek
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [38] Non-neoplastic indications and outcomes of the proximal and distal femur megaprosthesis: a critical review
    Raju Vaishya
    Sunil Singh Thapa
    Abhishek Vaish
    Knee Surgery & Related Research, 32
  • [39] Modular ceramic bearings on a CFRP total hip replacement femoral stem
    Dickinson, A.
    Browne, M.
    Taylor, A.
    BIOCERAMICS, VOL 20, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 361-363 : 799 - +
  • [40] Modular femoral component for conversion of previous hip surgery in total hip arthroplasty
    Goldstein, WM
    Branson, JJ
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 28 (09) : S1079 - S1084