Comparison of the effectiveness of screening methods for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: A cross-sectional study

被引:1
|
作者
Sahin, Mustafa [1 ]
Gorkem, Umit [2 ]
Bilgi, Ahmet [3 ]
Dikker, Okan [4 ]
机构
[1] Hitit Univ, Erol Olcok Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Biochem, Corum, Turkey
[2] Hitit Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Corum, Turkey
[3] Selcuk Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Konya, Turkey
[4] Okmeydani Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Biochem, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
PREVALENCE; CRITERIA; TESTS;
D O I
10.1111/ijcp.14857
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective The methods and criteria used for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening in pregnant women are updated by the relevant organisations in certain periods. We aimed to compare the efficiency of GDM screening tests in pregnant women and to investigate the reasons of different prevalence values reported in the literature. Materials and Methods In this retrospective cross-sectional study, a total of 2406 pregnant women who were admitted to the obstetric outpatient clinic for screening GDM, were included. All pregnant women were randomly screened between 24 and 28 gestational weeks, using one-step (75 gr glucose loading) or two-step (50 gr and 100 gr glucose loading) methods. The demographic, clinical and biochemical parameters of the study population were analysed. Results In our study, 680 pregnant women were screened by one-step method and 1726 by two-step method. The average age of the one-step and two-step groups was 28.3 +/- 5.7 and 28.1 +/- 5.1, respectively, and no statistically significant difference was found between the ages of the two groups (P = .647). Other baseline characteristics, including maternal age, maternal weight, height, body mass index, gestational week, multiparity, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse, fasting plasma glucose were not significantly different between the two groups (P > .05, for all). The prevalence of GDM was significantly higher in the one-step group than that in the two-step group: 158/680 (23.2%) versus 143/1683 (8.5%), respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the prevalence of the two groups (P < .001). Conclusion The reason for the different prevalence values obtained in GDM screening studies may be because of the preferred method. Considering the advantages and disadvantages of both methods, studies are needed in which international organisations will revise their diagnostic criteria. We think it would be more appropriate to use the two-step screening method until international professional organisations develop a new methodology and new cut-off values.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors associated with poor-to-moderate quality of life among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Malaysia
    Lee, Kai Wei
    Ching, Siew Mooi
    Hoo, Fan Kee
    Ramachandran, Vasudevan
    Chong, Seng Choi
    Tusimin, Maiza
    Ang, Faith En
    Nordin, Noraihan Mohd
    Devaraj, Navin Kumar
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (10) : 2725 - 2736
  • [32] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and results of the screening tests at a tertiary referral center: A cross-sectional study
    Ozgu-Erdinc, A. Seval
    Sert, Umit Yasemin
    Buyuk, Gul Nihal
    Engin-Ustun, Yaprak
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLIC SYNDROME-CLINICAL RESEARCH & REVIEWS, 2019, 13 (01) : 74 - 77
  • [33] Effectiveness of a screening protocol for gestational diabetes in pregnant Spanish women
    Martinez Bugallo, Francisco
    Rodriguez Alvarez, Cristobalina
    Aguirre-Jaime, Armando
    Di Renzo, Gian Carlo
    Gonzalez Gonzalez, Nieves Luisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2011, 24 (07): : 917 - 922
  • [34] Factors Associated with the Need for Breastfeeding Information Among Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-sectional Study
    Park, Seungmi
    Jang, In Sun
    Min, Deulle
    [J]. ASIAN NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (03) : 210 - 214
  • [35] Comparisons of Vitamin A and the Oxidative Stress Biomarker Levels in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus A Cross-Sectional Study
    Guo, Jing
    Luo, Lina
    Huang, Guihua
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Liu, Yunti
    Liu, Qi
    Wang, Xuqin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 66 (7-8) : 221 - 226
  • [36] Continuous interprofessional collaboration for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional survey in Japan
    Matsunaga, Mayumi
    Horiuchi, Shigeko
    Kataoka, Yaeko
    Igarashi, Yumiko
    Porter, Sarah E.
    Fukui, Toshiko
    [J]. JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE, 2021, 18 (04)
  • [37] Healthy behaviors and gestational diabetes mellitus in an Iranian setting: A cross-sectional study
    Zare, Maryam
    Mardi, Afrouz
    Yeghanenia, Paria
    Hackett, Daniel
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (09) : E36431
  • [38] Association between cardiometabolic index and gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study
    Chen, Minchun
    Xiong, Suqiang
    Zheng, Jie
    Zhang, Jingyi
    Ye, Dan
    Xian, Yusan
    Cao, Qing
    Yan, Kangkang
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2024,
  • [39] Effects of gestational and pregestational diabetes mellitus on the foetal heart: a cross-sectional study
    Dervisoglu, Pinar
    Kosecik, Mustafa
    Kumbasar, Serkan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 38 (03) : 408 - 412
  • [40] Association among gestational diabetes mellitus, periodontitis and prematurity: a cross-sectional study
    Damante, Carla Andreotti
    Foratori-Junior, Gerson Aparecido
    Cunha, Paula de Oliveira
    Negrato, Carlos Antonio
    Carvalho Sales-Peres, Silvia Helena
    Ragghianti Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer
    Passanezi Sant'Ana, Adriana Campos
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2022, 66 (01): : 58 - 67