DISTRICT COURT OPINIONS AS EVIDENCE OF INFLUENCE: GREEN V. SCHOOL BOARD AND THE SUPREME COURT'S ROLE IN LOCAL SCHOOL DESEGREGATION

被引：0

作者：

Rhinesmith, David ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Virginia, Sch Law, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA

来源：

VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW | 2010年 / 96卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：1137 / 1199

页数：63

共 50 条

[41] MURPHY V. NCAA: WRONGLY DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT (AND HERE'S WHY)
Fagan, Michael K.
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 2021, (05): : 1649 - 1672
[42] Rendering turner toothless:: The supreme Court's decision in Beard v. Banks
Wimsatt, Jennifer N.
[J]. DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 2008, 57 (04) : 1209 - 1241
[43] REFLECTIONS ON THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA'S DECISION IN R. V. SHARMA
Fehr, C. O. L. T. O. N.
[J]. ALBERTA LAW REVIEW, 2023, 60 (04) : 933 - 954
[44] The shortcomings of the Supreme Court's viewpoint discrimination analysis in Virginia v. Black
Berlin, MG
[J]. DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2003, 81 (01) : 143 - 167
[45] BC Teachers' Federation v British Columbia: The Supreme Court Takes a School Holiday
Tucker, Eric
[J]. RELATIONS INDUSTRIELLES-INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2018, 73 (03): : 603 - 616
[46] A request for congressional action:: Deconstructing the Supreme Court's (in)activism in Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School District, 118 s. ct. 1989 (1998) and Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education, 119 s. ct. 1661 (1999)
Safier, K
[J]. UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI LAW REVIEW, 2000, 68 (04) : 1309 - 1329
[47] JUSTIFICATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT'S USE OF FORCE: EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGTHS V. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Ruiz Ortiz, Salvador
Carrillo De Albornoz, Eduardo Osuna
Mainar Ene, Jose Maria
Martinez Marin, Jose
[J]. DERECHO PENAL Y CRIMINOLOGIA, 2018, 39 (107): : 155 - 176
[48] SECOND AMENDMENT STANDARDS OF REVIEW: WHAT THE SUPREME COURT LEFT UNANSWERED IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER
Anderson, Jason T.
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2009, 82 (03) : 547 - 594
[49] The supreme court's role in defining the jurisdiction of military tribunals:: A study, critique, & proposal for Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Baldrate, BC
[J]. MILITARY LAW REVIEW, 2005, 186 : 1 - 115
[50] METHODS OF PRESENTING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN COURT - PANELS VERSUS PARTY WITNESSING IN SCHOOL-DESEGREGATION CASES
CHESLER, MA
KALMUSS, DS
SANDERS, J
[J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1983, 11 (04) : 443 - 468

← 1 2 3 4 5 →