Total laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: which one is better?

被引:6
|
作者
Choi, Munseok [1 ]
Rho, Seoung Yoon [1 ]
Kim, Sung Hyun [2 ,3 ]
Hwang, Ho Kyoung [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Woo Jung [2 ,3 ]
Kang, Chang Moo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Yongin, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Surg, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Severance Hosp, Yonsei Canc Ctr, Pancreaticobiliary Canc Clin, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Ludlow Fac Res Bldg 201,50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
关键词
Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Pancreatic duct; PANCREATIC FISTULA; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; RISK SCORE; SURGERY; RECONSTRUCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09347-y
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is a challenging procedure. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is feasible and safe. Since the development of robotic platforms, the number of reports on robot-assisted pancreatic surgery has increased. We compared the technical feasibility and safety between LPD and robot-assisted LPD (RALPD). Methods From September 2012 to August 2020, 257 patients who underwent MIPD for periampullary tumors were enrolled. Of these, 207 underwent LPD and 50 underwent RALPD. We performed a 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis and retrospectively analyzed the demographics and surgical outcomes. Results After PSM analysis, no difference was noted in demographics. Operation times and estimated blood loss were similar, as was the incidence of complications (p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis in patients with soft pancreas with pancreatic duct <= 2 mm, no significant between-group difference was noted regarding short-term surgical outcomes, including clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) (p > 0.05). In multivariable analysis, the only soft pancreatic texture was a predictive factor (HR 3.887, 95% confidence interval 1.121-13.480, p = 0.032). Conclusion RALPD and LPD are safe and effective for MIPD and can compensate each other to achieve the goal of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:8959 / 8966
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial cystectomy
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A216 - A216
  • [42] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation
    Fenig, DM
    Berger, AD
    Kau, E
    Stifelman, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 204 - 204
  • [43] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Anvari, M
    Birch, DW
    Bamehriz, F
    Gryfe, R
    Chapman, T
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2004, 14 (06): : 311 - 315
  • [44] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy
    Gilleran, Jason P.
    Johnson, Matthew
    Hundley, Andrew
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2010, 2 (5-6) : 195 - 208
  • [45] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 : A234 - A234
  • [46] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Goh P.M.
    Lomanto D.
    So J.B.
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, 16 (1): : 216 - 217
  • [47] ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC CALYCEAL DIVERTICULECTOMY
    Smith, Hugh
    Jung, Nathan
    Class, Juan
    Singh, Amar
    Turner, Darryl
    Butler, Dana
    Keel, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1200 - E1200
  • [48] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy
    Pruthi, Raj S.
    Wallen, Eric M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (02) : 310 - 322
  • [49] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty
    Patel, V
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [50] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic esophageal surgery
    Ozawa, S
    Furukawa, T
    Wakabayashi, G
    Ando, N
    Kitagawa, Y
    Kitajima, M
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A477 - A477