Sensory Substitution for Tactile Feedback in Upper Limb Prostheses

被引:0
|
作者
Abdelrahman, Yasser [1 ,2 ]
Bennington, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Huberts, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
Sebt, Samira [1 ,2 ]
Talwar, Nipun [1 ,2 ]
Cauwenberghs, Gert [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Bioengn, Jacobs Sch Engn, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Inst Neural Computat, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629539
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Present commercially available prosthetic devices fall short when it comes to providing users with accurate and non-invasive tactile feedback from their artificial limb, leading to more difficult control and leaving many at a heightened risk of device rejection. Current methods of simulating hand sensation in patients affected by upper limb loss are either invasive and expensive, or otherwise sub-optimal in their feedback mechanism. Here we propose, build, and implement a novel device for tactile feedback in upper limb prostheses. The device consists of an adaptable tactile sensing glove that can be applied to existing artificial limbs and an audio feedback system that leverages the plasticity of the brain to communicate touch to the user through sensory substitution. This device aims to take advantage of the existing pathways between auditory and tactile sensory regions in the brain by mapping force magnitude and location from the integrated force sensors on the gloves to specific volume and frequency, respectively. The device was successfully manufactured for proof of concept, and further testing with prosthetic users will aim to assess the efficacy of the device and identify potential modifications for use in research and commercialization.
引用
收藏
页码:7519 / 7525
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Participatory Design Using Sensory Substitution Devices with Tactile and Audio Feedback
    Tuson, Ella
    Hughson, Samantha
    Zymaris, Christina
    King, Ryan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY (ASSETS'17), 2017, : 415 - 416
  • [32] Upper Limb Prostheses
    Simon, A. M.
    Turner, K.
    Miller, L. A.
    Hargrove, L. J.
    Kuiken, T. A.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS, 2020, 32 (2S) : 15 - 19
  • [33] A Review of Proprioceptive Feedback Strategies for Upper-Limb Myoelectric Prostheses
    Lecompte, Olivier
    Achiche, Sofiane
    Mohebbi, Abolfazl
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2024, 6 (03): : 930 - 939
  • [34] Investigating the Benefits of Multivariable Proprioceptive Feedback for Upper-Limb Prostheses
    Dideriksen, Jakob
    Siebold, Eleonore
    Dosen, Strahinja
    Markovic, Marko
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2024, 6 (02): : 757 - 768
  • [35] Tactile sensory substitution studies
    Bach-Y-Rita, P
    COEVOLUTION OF HUMAN POTENTIAL AND CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2004, 1013 : 83 - 91
  • [36] Tactile Perception in Upper Limb Prostheses: Mechanical Characterization, Human Experiments, and Computational Findings
    Ivani, Alessia S.
    Catalano, Manuel G.
    Grioli, Giorgio
    Bianchi, Matteo
    Visell, Yon
    Bicchi, Antonio
    IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2024, 17 (04) : 817 - 829
  • [37] A Prototype Haptic Feedback System for Lower-Limb Prostheses and Sensory Neuropathy
    Fan, Richard E.
    Culjat, Martin O.
    King, Chih-Hung
    Franco, Miguel L.
    Sedrak, Mark
    Bisley, James W.
    Dutson, Erik P.
    Grundfest, Warren S.
    MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 16: PARALLEL, COMBINATORIAL, CONVERGENT: NEXTMED BY DESIGN, 2008, 132 : 115 - +
  • [38] Providing Contact Sensory Feedback for Upper Limb Robotic Prosthesis
    Aziziaghdam, Mohammad
    Samur, Evren
    2014 IEEE HAPTICS SYMPOSIUM (HAPTICS), 2014, : 575 - 579
  • [39] Opinions on noninvasive sensory feedback of upper limb prosthetic users
    Smither, F. Clay
    Andrews, Karen L.
    Scrabeck, Tyson L.
    Lennon, Ryan J.
    Zhao, Kristin D.
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 46 (06) : 591 - 600
  • [40] ENGINEERING OF UPPER LIMB PROSTHESES
    LAW, HT
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1981, 12 (04) : 929 - 951