Different loading strategies of dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials

被引:0
|
作者
Esposito, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Grusovin, Maria Gabriella
Coulthard, Paul [1 ]
Worthington, Helen V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Cochrane Oral Hlth Grp, Manchester M15 6FH, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Biomat, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
dental implants; early loading; immediate loading; randomised controlled clinical trial; systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of 1) immediate (within 1 week), early (between 1 week to 2 months), and conventional (after 2 months) loading of osseointegrated implants, and of 2) immediate occlusal versus non-occlusal loading during the bone healing phase. Data sources: The Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched and several journals were handsearched with no language restriction up to June 2008. Review methods: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of osseointegrated dental implants, having a follow up of 4 months to 1 year, comparing the same implant type immediately, early and conventionally loaded or occlusally and non-occlusally loaded were eligible. Screening of studies, quality assessment and data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures and radiographic marginal bone level changes. Results: Thirty RCTs were identified and 22 trials including 976 patients in total were included. Twelve trials compared immediate versus conventional loading, three early versus conventional loading, six immediate versus early loading, and one occlusally versus non-occlusally loaded implants. On a patient, rather than per implant basis, there were no statistically significant differences for any of the meta-analyses. Conclusions: It is possible to successfully load dental implants immediately or early after their placement in selected patients, though not all clinicians may achieve optimal results. It is unclear whether it is beneficial to avoid occlusal contacts during the osseointegration phase. Trends suggest that immediately loaded implants fail more often than those conventionally loaded, but less commonly than those early loaded. If a clinician wishes to load early the implants, it might be wiser to load them immediately (within one week) than waiting for 1 to 2 months. A high degree of primary implant stability (high value of insertion torque) seems to be one of the prerequisites for a successful immediate/early loading procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 276
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: Cochrane systematic review of randomised trials
    Lieb, Klaus
    Voellm, Birgit
    Ruecker, Gerta
    Timmer, Antje
    Stoffers, Jutta M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 196 (01) : 4 - 12
  • [22] The clinical effectiveness of different parenting programmes for children with conduct problems: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Dretzke J.
    Davenport C.
    Frew E.
    Barlow J.
    Stewart-Brown S.
    Bayliss S.
    Taylor R.S.
    Sandercock J.
    Hyde C.
    [J]. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 3 (1)
  • [23] Clinical Performance Comparing Titanium and Titanium-Zirconium or Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fernandes, Paulo Rafael Esteves
    Otero, Ada Isis Pelaez
    Fernandes, Juliana Campos Hasse
    Nassani, Leonardo Mohamad
    Castilho, Rogerio Moraes
    de Oliveira Fernandes, Gustavo Vicentis
    [J]. DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [24] One-stage versus two-stage implant placement. A Cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials
    Esposito, Marco
    Grusovin, Maria Gabriella
    Chew, Yun Shane
    Coulthard, Paul
    Worthington, Helen V.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2009, 2 (02) : 91 - 99
  • [25] Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Elfeky, Adel
    Gillies, Katie
    Gardner, Heidi
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Ishaku, Timothy
    Treweek, Shaun
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [26] Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Adel Elfeky
    Katie Gillies
    Heidi Gardner
    Cynthia Fraser
    Timothy Ishaku
    Shaun Treweek
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [27] Variation of clinical outcomes used in glaucoma randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Ismail, Rehab
    Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 98 (04) : 464 - 468
  • [28] The clinical effectiveness of transurethral incision of the prostate: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Tania Lourenco
    Matthew Shaw
    Cynthia Fraser
    Graeme MacLennan
    James N’Dow
    Robert Pickard
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2010, 28 : 23 - 32
  • [29] Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care
    Young, Amber E.
    Davies, Anna
    Bland, Sophie
    Brookes, Sara
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [30] The rates and measurement of adherence to acamprosate in randomised controlled clinical trials: A systematic review
    Donoghue, Kim
    Hermann, Laura
    Brobbin, Eileen
    Drummond, Colin
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):