What are they saying? A speech act analysis of a vaccination information debate on Facebook

被引：3

作者：

Bonnici, Laurie ^{[1
]}

Ma, Jinxuan ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Alabama, Sch Lib & Informat Studies, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA

[2] Emporia State Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Management, Emporia, KS 66801 USA

来源：

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND LIBRARY SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DE L INFORMATION ET DE BIBLIOTHECONOMIE | 2021年 / 44卷 / 01期

关键词：

Speech act theory; COVID-19; pandemic; anti-vaccination participants; pro-vaccination participants; information behaviour; RECORDS;

D O I：

10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v44i1.13342

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

The global resurgence of vaccine preventable diseases is garnering attention amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination information debates in a Facebook group give participants access to second-hand knowledge conveying personal experiences. Through the lens of Speech Act Theory, this study analysed discourses on pro-and anti-vaccination perspectives along with views from vaccine hesitant groups. Analysis reveals significant criticism of behaviour around information. Findings indicate provision of substantiating information would play a crucial role in debate within divergent information contexts. Application of Speech Act Theory serves to inform participant communication more intimately and empowers their engagement in polarized discussion.

引用

页码：19 / 37

页数：19

共 50 条

[41] What Are Couples Saying About Relationship Education? A Content Analysis
Burr, Brandon K.
Hubler, Daniel S.
Gardner, Brandt C.
Roberts, Kelly M.
Patterson, Jennifer
[J]. JOURNAL OF COUPLE & RELATIONSHIP THERAPY-INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL AND EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 13 (03): : 177 - 197
[42] More than Conveying Information: Informed Consent as Speech Act
Wong, Bonnie O.
Batten, Jason N.
Blythe, Jacob A.
Magnus, David C.
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2021, 21 (05): : 1 - 3
[43] Neural Processing of What and Who Information in Speech
Chandrasekaran, Bharath
Chan, Alice H. D.
Wong, Patrick C. M.
[J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (10) : 2690 - 2700
[44] Building Personalized Trust: Discovering What Makes One Trust and Act on Facebook Posts
Zhou, Michelle X.
Yang, Huahai
Mark, Gloria
Hu, Mengdie
Mahumd, Jalal
Pal, Aditya
[J]. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 2021, 4 (03)
[45] CONGRESSIONAL ARBITRAGE AT THE EXECUTIVE'S EXPENSE: THE SPEECH OR DEBATE CLAUSE AND THE UNENFORCEABLE STOCK ACT
Fodor, Anna
[J]. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2014, 108 (02) : 607 - 638
[46] Has Derrida deconstructed speech act theory? The Derrida-Searle debate revisited
Freundlieb, D
[J]. IDEALISTIC STUDIES, 2001, 31 (2-3) : 81 - 103
[47] A SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS OF SELECTED YORUBA ANTHROPONYMS
Omoloso, Rahim Kajogbola
[J]. DIALECTOLOGIA, 2015, (15): : 117 - 135
[48] Argumentation as a Speech Act: Two Levels of Analysis
Amalia Haro Marchal
[J]. Topoi, 2023, 42 : 481 - 494
[49] The construction of away messages:: A speech act analysis
Nastri, Jacqueline
Pena, Jorge
Hancock, Jeffrey T.
[J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2006, 11 (04):
[50] The Normativity of Linguistic Originalism: A Speech Act Analysis
Danaher, John
[J]. LAW AND PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 34 (04) : 397 - 431

← 1 2 3 4 5 →