ACCURACY OF RAPID PROTOTYPE MODELS FOR HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION

被引:52
|
作者
Taft, Robert M. [1 ]
Kondor, Shayne [1 ]
Grant, Gerald T. [1 ]
机构
[1] USN, Sch Postgrad Dent, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2011年 / 106卷 / 06期
关键词
MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60154-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Rapid prototype (RP) models are used in craniofacial reconstructions; however, there are no standards or acceptable limits to ensure accuracy of the fabricated models. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of RP models by validating the accuracy of SLA skull models with a coordinate measurement device. Material and methods. Stainless steel spheres were located on a dry cadaver skull as fiducial markers, scanned with Multi Detector Computer Tomography (MDCT), and interpreted with software for rapid prototyping. Seven stereo-lithographic (SLA) models were fabricated and measured with a coordinate measurement device. An Euler rotation transformation calculation was applied to standardize the coordinate system between the control and the models. A paired standard t test (alpha=.05) was used to compare fiducial marker locations on SLA models with the control. Results. A significant difference was found between the control and each of the SLA models (P<.001) in the Z axis additive build. Significant dimensional differences were not consistently detected in the X and Y axes. Dimensional deviations fell within the size of the MDCT scans voxel dimensions. Conclusions. The greatest discrepancies of medical model fabrication correspond to the largest dimension of the orthotropic voxel volume of the MDCT scan, which is related to the slice thickness of the scan and the Z axis of the RP model. However, the absolute magnitude of the error was small, well within the generally accepted tolerance for patient treatment. (J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:399-408)
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 408
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Current Options in Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Hurvitz, Keith A.
    Kobayashi, Mark
    Evans, Gregory R. D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (05) : 122E - 133E
  • [32] MUSCULOCUTANEOUS FLAPS IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    ARIYAN, S
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1980, 60 (05) : 1187 - 1199
  • [33] Advances in head and neck reconstruction.
    Jha, Abhishek
    Gupta, Prakhar
    Khalid, Mohd
    Naseem, Iqbal
    Gupta, Gagan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 25 (02) : E101 - E102
  • [34] MYOCUTANEOUS FLAPS FOR HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    JAFEK, BW
    GUMPRECHT, TF
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1980, 133 (04): : 326 - 326
  • [35] MYOCUTANEOUS FLAPS FOR HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    TOBIN, GR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1984, 147 (02): : 305 - 305
  • [36] RECONSTRUCTION OF DIFFICULT HEAD AND NECK WOUNDS
    LARSON, DL
    SANGER, JR
    PROBLEMS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 1989, 6 (04): : 481 - 500
  • [37] MYOCUTANEOUS FLAPS FOR HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    ARIYAN, S
    CUONO, CB
    HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1980, 2 (04): : 321 - 345
  • [38] Nerve grafts in head and neck reconstruction
    Hoshal, Steven G.
    Solis, Roberto N.
    Bewley, Arnaud F.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 28 (05): : 346 - 351
  • [39] MYOCUTANEOUS FLAPS IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    DONSKI, P
    MCCRAW, JB
    CHIRURGIA PLASTICA, 1979, 4 (04): : 255 - 261
  • [40] Medicinal leech in head and neck reconstruction
    Irish, JC
    Gullane, PJ
    Mulholland, S
    Neligan, PC
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 29 (05): : 327 - 332