Classification of breast masses and normal tissues in digital tomosynthesis mammography - art. no. 691508

被引:0
|
作者
Wei, Jun [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Yiheng [1 ]
Sahiner, Berkman [1 ]
Zhou, Chuan [1 ]
Ge, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Yi-Ta [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
digital tomosynthesis mammography (DTM); simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART); breast mass; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis;
D O I
10.1117/12.771189
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Digital tomosynthesis mammography (DTM) can provide quasi-3D structural information of the breast by reconstructing the breast volume from projection views (PV) acquired in a limited angular range. Our purpose is to design an effective classifier to distinguish breast masses from normal tissues in DTMs. A data set of 100 DTM cases collected with a GE first generation prototype DTM system at the Massachusetts General Hospital was used. We reconstructed the DTMs using a simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART). Mass candidates were identified by 3D gradient field analysis. Three approaches to distinguish breast masses from normal tissues were evaluated. In the 3D approach, we extracted morphological and run-length statistics texture features from DTM slices as input to a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier. In the 2D approach, the raw input PVs were first preprocessed with a Laplacian pyramid multi-resolution enhancement scheme. A mass candidate was then forward-projected to the preprocessed PVs in order to determine the corresponding regions of interest (ROIs). Spatial gray-level dependence (SGLD) texture features were extracted from each ROI and averaged over 11 PVs. An LDA classifier was designed to distinguish the masses from normal tissues. In the combined approach, the LDA scores from the 3D and 2D approaches were averaged to generate a mass likelihood score for each candidate. The A(z) values were 0.87 +/- 0.02, 0.86 +/- 0.02, and 0.91 +/- 0.02 for the 3D, 2D, and combined approaches, respectively. The difference between the A(z) values of the 3D and 2D approaches did not achieve statistical significance. The performance of the combined approach was significantly (p<0.05) better than either the 3D or 2D approach alone. The combined classifier will be useful for false-positive reduction in computerized mass detection in DTM.
引用
收藏
页码:91508 / 91508
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital breast tomosynthesis mammography: Computerized classification of malignant and benign masses
    Chan, H. P.
    Wu, Y.
    Sahiner, B.
    Zhang, Y.
    Moore, R. H.
    Kopans, D. B.
    Hadjiiski, L.
    Helvie, M. A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2645 - 2645
  • [2] Masses detection in breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a model observer study
    Castella, C.
    Ruschin, M.
    Eckstein, M. P.
    Abbey, C. K.
    Kinkel, K.
    Verdun, F. R.
    Tingberg, A.
    Bochud, F. O.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2009: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2009, 7263
  • [3] Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Moseley, Tanya W.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (02): : 362 - 379
  • [4] Selective photon counter for digital x-ray mammography tomosynthesis - art. no. 61425B
    Goldan, Amir H.
    Karim, Karim S.
    Rowlands, J. A.
    [J]. Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1-3, 2006, 6142 : B1425 - B1425
  • [5] Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Young
    Kim, Ga Ram
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Park, Ko Woon
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 319 - 329
  • [6] Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications
    Ji Soo Choi
    Boo-Kyung Han
    Eun Young Ko
    Ga Ram Kim
    Eun Sook Ko
    Ko Woon Park
    [J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 319 - 329
  • [7] Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Mann, Ritse
    [J]. SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2021, 72 : 214 - 225
  • [8] Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis mammography: Effects of the number of projection views and dose
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Wei, Jun
    Zhang, Yiheng
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Helvie, Mark A.
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 279 - 285
  • [9] Breast Cancer Detection: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Mammography versus Digital Mammography
    Ha, Su Min
    Chang, Jung Min
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (03)
  • [10] BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING?
    Svahn, Tony
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, : 53 - 56