Implementation of adverse event reporting for medical devices, India

被引:19
|
作者
Shukla, Shatrunajay [1 ]
Gupta, Madhur [2 ]
Pandit, Sabitri [1 ]
Thomson, Milu [1 ]
Shivhare, Abhimanyu [1 ]
Kalaiselvan, Vivekanandan [1 ]
Singh, Gyanendra Nath [3 ]
机构
[1] Govt India, Minist Hlth & Family Welf, Med Device & Materiovigilance Programme India, Pharmacopoeia Commiss, Sect 23, Ghaziabad 201002, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Off WHO Representat India, New Delhi, India
[3] Minist Hlth & Family Welf, Indian Pharmacopoeia Commiss, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
REGULATIONS;
D O I
10.2471/BLT.19.232785
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Problem Rapid growth in the use of medical devices has drawn attention to gaps in the systematic monitoring of medical device-associated adverse events in India. Approach Implementation of national regulations on medical devices started in January 2018. Supported by a nationwide network of monitoring centres, the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission coordinates adverse event reports from manufacturers, legal representatives and patients or users. The commission follows-up and reviews reports with subject expert groups and sends recommendations on necessary action to the national regulatory authority. Local setting Before 2015, no systematic structure was in place to collate adverse events associated with medical devices. Several reports of deaths and hospitalization due to faulty hip implants, cardiac stents and poor-quality devices prompted the health ministry to launch the materiovigilance programme. Relevant changes From July 2015 to October 2019, the commission received 1931 adverse event reports, mostly from marketing authorization holders; 1277 were serious events. Reporting increased markedly after 2017. Cardiac stents were the most reported device (926 events; 47.95%). To encourage a culture of reporting, the commission has raised awareness about the programme among stakeholders, developed user-friendly reporting tools and guidelines, and conducted training for hospital personnel on medical device adverse event reporting. Lessons learnt Regular training to stakeholders develops a sense of responsibility towards reporting medical device adverse events and ensures quality data reporting. Reporters must be assured that reporting adverse events does not have any legal implications for them and given acknowledgement of their role in high-quality device associated adverse event reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 211
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adverse event reporting tool for sedation
    Roelofse, J. A.
    [J]. SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2012, 18 (01) : 60 - 60
  • [32] Adverse Event Reporting for Compounded Drugs
    不详
    [J]. BIOPHARM INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 (10) : 10 - 10
  • [33] Online Network for Adverse Event Reporting
    Redberg, Rita F.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (05) : 354 - 354
  • [34] Advocating for Mandatory Adverse Event Reporting
    Hanke, C. William
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2012, 38 (02) : 178 - 179
  • [35] NATIONAL ADVERSE DRUG EVENT REPORTING
    KENNEDY, DL
    TANNER, LA
    BARASH, D
    GOETSCH, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1993, 50 (09): : 1913 - 1914
  • [36] AI as a Medical Device Adverse Event Reporting in Regulatory Databases: Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Kale, Aditya U.
    Dattani, Riya
    Tabansi, Ashley
    Hogg, Henry David Jeffry
    Pearson, Russell
    Glocker, Ben
    Golder, Su
    Waring, Justin
    Liu, Xiaoxuan
    Moore, David J.
    Denniston, Alastair K.
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [37] Evaluation of Machine Translation Accuracy Focused on the Adverse Event Terminology for Medical Devices
    Yagahara, Ayako
    Uesugi, Masahito
    Yokoi, Hideto
    [J]. MEDINFO 2023 - THE FUTURE IS ACCESSIBLE, 2024, 310 : 1450 - 1451
  • [38] Reporting of adverse events related to medical devices: A single-center experience from a tertiary care institute of national importance in India
    Meher, Bikash Ranjan
    Dash, Ashish
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 55 (02) : 128 - 132
  • [39] Disease-specific guidelines for reporting adverse events for peripheral vascular medical devices
    Ouriel, Kenneth
    Fowl, Richard J.
    Davies, Mark G.
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Gambhir, Raghvinder P. S.
    Ricci, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (01) : 212 - 225
  • [40] REPORTING THE FAILURE OF MEDICAL DEVICES
    KOSSOVSKY, N
    DUJOVNY, M
    KOSSOWSKY, R
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (07): : 447 - 447