Implementation of adverse event reporting for medical devices, India

被引:19
|
作者
Shukla, Shatrunajay [1 ]
Gupta, Madhur [2 ]
Pandit, Sabitri [1 ]
Thomson, Milu [1 ]
Shivhare, Abhimanyu [1 ]
Kalaiselvan, Vivekanandan [1 ]
Singh, Gyanendra Nath [3 ]
机构
[1] Govt India, Minist Hlth & Family Welf, Med Device & Materiovigilance Programme India, Pharmacopoeia Commiss, Sect 23, Ghaziabad 201002, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Off WHO Representat India, New Delhi, India
[3] Minist Hlth & Family Welf, Indian Pharmacopoeia Commiss, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
REGULATIONS;
D O I
10.2471/BLT.19.232785
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Problem Rapid growth in the use of medical devices has drawn attention to gaps in the systematic monitoring of medical device-associated adverse events in India. Approach Implementation of national regulations on medical devices started in January 2018. Supported by a nationwide network of monitoring centres, the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission coordinates adverse event reports from manufacturers, legal representatives and patients or users. The commission follows-up and reviews reports with subject expert groups and sends recommendations on necessary action to the national regulatory authority. Local setting Before 2015, no systematic structure was in place to collate adverse events associated with medical devices. Several reports of deaths and hospitalization due to faulty hip implants, cardiac stents and poor-quality devices prompted the health ministry to launch the materiovigilance programme. Relevant changes From July 2015 to October 2019, the commission received 1931 adverse event reports, mostly from marketing authorization holders; 1277 were serious events. Reporting increased markedly after 2017. Cardiac stents were the most reported device (926 events; 47.95%). To encourage a culture of reporting, the commission has raised awareness about the programme among stakeholders, developed user-friendly reporting tools and guidelines, and conducted training for hospital personnel on medical device adverse event reporting. Lessons learnt Regular training to stakeholders develops a sense of responsibility towards reporting medical device adverse events and ensures quality data reporting. Reporters must be assured that reporting adverse events does not have any legal implications for them and given acknowledgement of their role in high-quality device associated adverse event reporting.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 211
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GENDER DISPARITIES IN ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING FOR MEDICAL DEVICES
    Pierce, Hudson
    Ahsan, Muhammad
    Goel, Shokhi
    Asfaw, Tirsit
    Anger, Jennifer
    Chughtai, Bilal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1256 - E1257
  • [2] Improving FDA postmarket adverse event reporting for medical devices
    Wunnava, Susmitha
    Miller, Timothy A.
    Bourgeois, Florence T.
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (02) : 83 - 84
  • [4] Adverse incident reporting for medical devices - A comparison with pharmacovigilance
    Jefferys, D
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2005, 39 (01): : 73 - 80
  • [5] Adverse Incident Reporting for Medical Devices—A Comparison with Pharmacovigilance
    David Jefferys
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2005, 39 (1): : 73 - 80
  • [6] Intraocular devices associated adverse events reporting system in India
    Kalaiselvan, Vivekanandan
    Saxena, Rohit
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 68 (11) : 2343 - 2345
  • [7] Adverse event reporting
    Kruft, Bonnie
    Nelson, Lindsay A.
    Stewart, Jeanette A.
    Stewart, William C.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 114 (07) : 1420 - 1420
  • [8] Serious Adverse Event Reporting in a Medical Device Information System
    Pecoraro, Fabrizio
    Luzi, Daniela
    [J]. USER CENTRED NETWORKED HEALTH CARE, 2011, 169 : 834 - 838
  • [9] Adverse event reporting and standardized medical terminologies: Strengths and limitations
    Goldman, SA
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2002, 36 (02): : 439 - 444
  • [10] Adverse Event Reporting and Standardized Medical Terminologies: Strengths and Limitations
    Stephen A. Goldman
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2002, 36 : 439 - 444