Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing

被引:102
|
作者
Mair, H
Sachweh, J
Meuris, B
Nollert, G
Schmoeckel, M
Schuetz, A
Reichart, B
Daebritz, S
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Cardiac Surg, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Aachen, Dept Cardiac Surg, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Cardiac Surg, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
surgically placed epicardial LV-lead; cardiac resynchronization therapy; heart failure;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Biventricular pacing has demonstrated improvement in cardiac function in treating congestive heart failure (CHF). Two different operative strategies (coronary sinus vs. epicardiat stimulation) for left ventricular (LV) pacing were compared. Methods: Since April 1999, a total of 86 patients (pts, age: 63 +/- 10 years) with depressed systolic LV function (mean ejection fraction 24 +/- 9%), left bundle-branch-block (mean QRS 182 +/- 22 ms) and congestive heart failure NYHA III or higher were enrolled. For biventricular stimulation coronary sinus (CS) leads were placed in 79 pts. Nine of these devices were converted to surgical epicardiat LV-leads, because of CS-lead failure. In 7 patients epicardial LV-leads were initially implanted surgically, accounting for a total of 16 pts with surgical placed epicardial steroid-eluting LV-leads. For these, a limited left-lateral thoracotomy (7 +/- 4 cm) was used. Thirty-three (38%) pts had an indication for a defibrillator. The mean follow-up time was 16.4 +/- 15.4 months (0.1-45 months), representing 107.1 patient-years. Results: In the biventricular pacing mode, QRS duration decreased to 143 16 ms (P<0.001). Threshold capture of the CS-leads increased significantly compared to surgically placed epicardiat leads (18 month control: 2.2 +/- 1.4 V/0.5 ms vs. 0.7 +/- 0.3 V/0.5 ms), which had no increase in threshold (P<0.001). At the 18 month follow-up 7 CS-Leads had a threshold of >4V/0.5 ms vs. epicardial leads which were under 1.1 V/0.5 ms, except for one (1.8 V/0.5 ms). After CS-lead implantation 25 LV-lead related complications occurred, (failed implantation, CS-dissection, loss of pacing capture, diaphragm stimulation or lead dislodgment), vs. one dislodgement after surgical epicardiat lead placement (P<0.05). Correct lead positioning (obtuse marginal branch area) was achieved in all surgical epicardiat placements but only in 70% with CS-Leads (P<0.03). In the follow up period, 9 pts died (4 cardiac related). Heart transplantation was necessary in 4 pts due to deterioration of the cardiornyopathy. Conclusions: Surgical epicardial. lead placement revealed excellent long-term results and a tower LV-related complication rate compared to CS-Leads. Although, the approach via limited thoracotomy for biventricutar pacing is associated with 'more surgery', it is a safe and reliable technique and should be considered as an equal alternative. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 242
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance of the coronary sinus lead position on the clinical benefit of biventricular pacing
    Saad, EB
    Golshayan, AR
    Bhargava, M
    Khaykin, Y
    Burkhardt, JD
    Abdul-Karim, A
    Martin, DO
    Marrouche, NF
    Saliba, WI
    Schweikert, RA
    Tchou, PJ
    Natale, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 114A - 114A
  • [32] Utilization of intracardiac echocardiography to access the coronary sinus for left ventricular lead placement
    Shalaby, AA
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 28 (06): : 493 - 497
  • [33] Coronary sinus angioplasty to enable optimal left ventricular lead placement for resynchronization
    Medeiros, Paulo
    Lousinha, Ana
    Oliveira, Mario Martins
    [J]. HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [34] Transesophageal echocardiography guided placement of a coronary sinus pacing lead
    Artrip, JH
    Sukerman, D
    Dickstein, ML
    Spotnitz, HM
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 74 (04): : 1254 - 1256
  • [35] Coronary sinus spasm during biventricutar pacing lead placement
    Chen, PS
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (08) : 901 - 901
  • [36] Facilitated minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement
    Doll, N
    Opfermann, UT
    Rastan, AJ
    Walther, T
    Bernau, H
    Gummert, JF
    Mohr, FW
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 79 (03): : 1023 - 1025
  • [37] Left ventricular pacing lead insertion via the coronary sinus cardioplegia cannula: A novel method for temporary biventricular pacing during reoperative cardiac surgery
    Wang, Daniel Y.
    Gerrah, Rabin
    Rusanov, Alexander
    Yalamanchi, Vinay
    Cabreriza, Santos E.
    Spotnitz, Henry M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 142 (01): : 73 - 76
  • [38] Left ventricular pacing lead insertion via the coronary sinus cardioplegia cannula: A novel method for temporary biventricular pacing during reoperative cardiac surgery
    Wang, Daniel Y.
    Gerrah, Rabin
    Rusanov, Alexander
    Yalamanchi, Vinay
    Cabreriza, Santos E.
    Spotnitz, Henry M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2010, 211 (03) : S34 - S34
  • [39] Left ventricular anterolateral site is the preferable left ventricular lead position for an upgrade to biventricular pacing
    Ogano, M.
    Iwasaki, Y.
    Okada, T.
    Tanabe, J.
    Shimizu, W.
    Asai, K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [40] Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead Placement: Unfavorable Lead Location and Impact on Clinical Response
    Reddy, Madhu
    Biria, Mazda
    Subramanyam, Prem
    Pillarisetti, Jayasree
    Boolani, Hemant
    Reddy, Namrata
    Atkins, Donita
    Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)