A protocol for a systematic review of process evaluations of interventions investigating sedentary behaviour in adults

被引:2
|
作者
Corepal, Rekesh [1 ]
Hall, Jessica Faye [1 ]
English, Coralie [2 ]
Farrin, Amanda [3 ]
Fitzsimons, Claire F. [4 ]
Forster, Anne [5 ]
Lawton, Rebecca [6 ,7 ]
Mead, Gillian [8 ]
Clarke, David [5 ]
机构
[1] Bradford Royal Infirm, Acad Unit Elderly Care & Rehabil, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, ISPEHS, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Elderly Care & Rehabil, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Inst Psychol Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Bradford Inst Hlth Res, Qual & Safety Res, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Edinburgh, Geriatr Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
systematic review; process evaluation; sedentary behaviour; protocol; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031291
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Sedentary behaviour is defined as any waking behaviour characterised by low energy expenditure <= 1.5 metabolic equivalents while in a sitting, lying or reclining posture. The expanding evidence base suggests that sedentary behaviour may have a detrimental effect on health, well-being and is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. We aim to review process evaluations of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which included a measure of sedentary behaviour in adults in order to develop an understanding of intervention content, mechanisms of impact, implementation and delivery approaches and contexts, in which interventions were reported to be effective or effective. A secondary aim is to summarise participants, family and staff experiences of such interventions. Methods and analysis Ten electronic databases and reference lists from previous similar reviews will be searched. Eligible studies will be process evaluations of RCTs that measure sedentary behaviour as a primary or secondary outcome in adults. As this review will contribute to a programme to develop a community-based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in stroke survivors, interventions delivered in schools, colleges, universities or workplaces will be excluded. Two reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Disagreements between reviewers will be resolved by a third reviewer. Process evaluation data to be extracted include the aims and methods used in the process evaluation; implementation data; mechanisms of impact; contextual factors; participant, family and staff experiences of the interventions. A narrative approach will be used to synthesise and report qualitative and quantitative data. Reporting of the review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidance. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effectiveness of sedentary behaviour interventions on sitting time and screen time in children and adults: an umbrella review of systematic reviews
    Nguyen Phuong
    Le, Long Khanh-Dao
    Nguyen Dieu
    Gao, Lan
    Dunstan, David W.
    Moodie, Marj
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [22] Effectiveness of interventions for reducing non-occupational sedentary behaviour in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shrestha, Nipun
    Grgic, Jozo
    Wiesner, Glen
    Parker, Alexandra
    Podnar, Hrvoje
    Bennie, Jason A.
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Pedisic, Zeljko
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (19) : 1206 - +
  • [23] Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults (Review)
    Chastin, Sebastien
    Gardiner, Paul A.
    Harvey, Juliet A.
    Leask, Calum F.
    Jerez-Roig, Javier
    Rosenberg, Dori
    Ashe, Maureen C.
    Helbostad, Jorunn L.
    Skelton, Dawn A.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, (06):
  • [24] Interventions on children’s and adolescents’ physical activity and sedentary behaviour: protocol for a systematic review from a sex/gender perspective
    Yolanda Demetriou
    Catherina Vondung
    Jens Bucksch
    Annegret Schlund
    Carolin Schulze
    Guido Knapp
    Stephanie E. Coen
    Lorri Puil
    Susan P. Phillips
    Anne K. Reimers
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [25] Interventions on children's and adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behaviour: protocol for a systematic review from a sex/gender perspective
    Demetriou, Yolanda
    Vondung, Catherina
    Bucksch, Jens
    Schlund, Annegret
    Schulze, Carolin
    Knapp, Guido
    Coen, Stephanie E.
    Puil, Lorri
    Phillips, Susan P.
    Reimers, Anne K.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [26] The relationship between sedentary behaviour and physical activity in adults: A systematic review
    Mansoubi, Maedeh
    Pearson, Natalie
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Clemes, Stacy
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 69 : 28 - 35
  • [27] Correlates of Sedentary Behaviour in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities-A Systematic Review
    Oppewal, Alyt
    Hilgenkamp, Thessa I. M.
    Elinder, Liselotte Schafer
    Freiberger, Ellen
    Rintala, Pauli
    Guerra-Balic, Myriam
    Gine-Garriga, Maria
    Cuesta-Vargas, Antonio
    Oviedo, Guillermo R.
    Sansano-Nadal, Oriol
    Izquierdo-Gomez, Rocio
    Einarsson, Ingi
    Teittinen, Antti
    Melville, Craig A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10)
  • [28] Validity of accelerometers for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults: A systematic review
    Heesch, Kristiann C.
    Hill, Robert
    Aguilar-Farias, Nicolas
    van Uffelen, Jannique
    Pavey, Toby
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S218 - S218
  • [29] School-based Interventions to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Children: A Systematic Review
    Hegarty, Lynda M.
    Mair, Jacqueline L.
    Kirby, Karen
    Murtagh, Elaine
    Murphy, Marie H.
    [J]. AIMS PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 3 (03): : 520 - 541
  • [30] A comparison of the effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in reducing sedentary time in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
    Prince, S. A.
    Saunders, T. J.
    Gresty, K.
    Reid, R. D.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2014, 15 (11) : 905 - 919