A protocol for a systematic review of process evaluations of interventions investigating sedentary behaviour in adults

被引:2
|
作者
Corepal, Rekesh [1 ]
Hall, Jessica Faye [1 ]
English, Coralie [2 ]
Farrin, Amanda [3 ]
Fitzsimons, Claire F. [4 ]
Forster, Anne [5 ]
Lawton, Rebecca [6 ,7 ]
Mead, Gillian [8 ]
Clarke, David [5 ]
机构
[1] Bradford Royal Infirm, Acad Unit Elderly Care & Rehabil, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Newcastle, Sch Hlth Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Leeds, Clin Trials Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, ISPEHS, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Elderly Care & Rehabil, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[6] Univ Leeds, Inst Psychol Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[7] Bradford Inst Hlth Res, Qual & Safety Res, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[8] Univ Edinburgh, Geriatr Med, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
systematic review; process evaluation; sedentary behaviour; protocol; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH; TIME;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031291
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Sedentary behaviour is defined as any waking behaviour characterised by low energy expenditure <= 1.5 metabolic equivalents while in a sitting, lying or reclining posture. The expanding evidence base suggests that sedentary behaviour may have a detrimental effect on health, well-being and is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. We aim to review process evaluations of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which included a measure of sedentary behaviour in adults in order to develop an understanding of intervention content, mechanisms of impact, implementation and delivery approaches and contexts, in which interventions were reported to be effective or effective. A secondary aim is to summarise participants, family and staff experiences of such interventions. Methods and analysis Ten electronic databases and reference lists from previous similar reviews will be searched. Eligible studies will be process evaluations of RCTs that measure sedentary behaviour as a primary or secondary outcome in adults. As this review will contribute to a programme to develop a community-based intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour in stroke survivors, interventions delivered in schools, colleges, universities or workplaces will be excluded. Two reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. Disagreements between reviewers will be resolved by a third reviewer. Process evaluation data to be extracted include the aims and methods used in the process evaluation; implementation data; mechanisms of impact; contextual factors; participant, family and staff experiences of the interventions. A narrative approach will be used to synthesise and report qualitative and quantitative data. Reporting of the review will be informed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidance. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Systematic review of process evaluations of interventions in trials investigating sedentary behaviour in adults
    Johansson, Jessica Faye
    Lam, Natalie
    Ozer, Seline
    Hall, Jennifer
    Morton, Sarah
    English, Coralie
    Fitzsimons, Claire F.
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Forster, Anne
    Clarke, David
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [2] The effectiveness of workplace interventions to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behaviour in adults: Protocol for a systematic review
    Loitz C.C.
    Potter R.J.
    Walker J.L.
    McLeod N.C.
    Johnston N.J.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [3] Effectiveness of physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in altering sedentary behaviour among older adults: a systematic review
    McCorry, Michael J.
    Murphy, Marie H.
    Bleakley, Chris
    Mair, Jacqueline
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 392 : 61 - 61
  • [4] Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions
    Cochrane, M.
    Watson, P. M.
    Timpson, H.
    Haycox, A.
    Collins, B.
    Jones, L.
    Martin, A.
    Graves, L. E. F.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 232 : 156 - 167
  • [5] Correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review
    Prince, S. A.
    Reed, J. L.
    McFetridge, C.
    Tremblay, M. S.
    Reid, R. D.
    [J]. OBESITY REVIEWS, 2017, 18 (08) : 915 - 935
  • [6] Sedentary behaviour in older adults: A systematic review
    Chen Yu-Ling
    Pearson, Natalie
    Biddle, Stuart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 20 : S249 - S250
  • [7] A review of interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in older adults
    Gardiner, Paul
    Healy, Genevieve
    Owen, Neville
    Eakin, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2012, 20 : S302 - S303
  • [8] Effectiveness of Interventions for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Protocol for a Systematic Review
    Karkauskiene, Erika
    Tully, Mark A.
    Dudoniene, Vilma
    Gine-Garriga, Maria
    Escriba-Salvans, Anna
    Font-Jutgla, Cristina
    Jerez-Roig, Javier
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (14)
  • [9] Behaviour change interventions to improve physical activity in adults: a systematic review of economic evaluations
    Barrett, Stephen
    Begg, Stephen
    Lawrence, Jack
    Barrett, Gabrielle
    Nitschke, Josh
    O'Halloran, Paul
    Breckon, Jeff
    Pinheiro, Marina De Barros
    Sherrington, Catherine
    Doran, Chris
    Kingsley, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [10] Systematic review of interventions outside the workplace for reducing sedentary behaviour in adults under 60 years
    Murtagh, Elaine
    Foster, Charles
    Milton, Karen
    Roberts, Nia
    O'Gorman, Clodagh
    Murphy, Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S120 - S121