Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes

被引:5
|
作者
Bondoc, Melanie [1 ]
Hancu, Maria [1 ]
DiMarzio, Marisa [1 ]
Sheldon, Breanna L. [1 ]
Shao, Miriam M. [1 ]
Khazen, Olga [1 ]
Pilitsis, Julie G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Albany Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Albany, NY 12208 USA
关键词
Spinal cord stimulation; Chronic pain; Failed back surgery syndrome; Geriatrics; FOLLOW-UP; BACK; TRIAL; FORM;
D O I
10.1159/000517426
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an efficacious chronic pain treatment most commonly used in middle-aged patients. Results from previous studies that investigated SCS ' effects in older patient populations have been equivocal. We examine whether SCS outcomes correlate with age. Methods: We retrospectively examined prospectively collected outcomes from 189 patients who underwent SCS at Albany Medical Center between 2012 and 2020. The patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The mean percent change in each outcome was determined and compared via a regression analysis to determine relationships between patient age and each respective outcome metrics. Demographics were compared between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older via chi(2) tests. Results: All subjects demonstrated the expected improvement on NRS, BDI, PCS, and MPQ from baseline to 1-year follow-up, with several demonstrating statistically significant changes: NRS-worst pain (18.66%, p < 0.001), NRS-least pain (26.9%, p < 0.001), NRS-average pain (26.9%, p < 0.01), NRS-current pain (26.4%, p < 0.001), ODI (19.6%, p < 0.001), PCS (29.8%, p < 0.001), and MPQ (29.4%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between patients aged under 65 versus those aged 65 and older based on lead type (p = 0.454). Six patients (3.1%) had lead migration, one of whom was 65 or older. Regression analysis revealed improvements in MPQ-sensory and MPQ-affective scores as age increased (p < 0.001, R-2 = 0.09; p = 0.046, R-2 = 0.05, respectively). Age did not correlate with NRS, ODI, BDI, or PCS. Diagnosis, spinal level of SCS, and lead type were not found to influence any respective outcome measure based on covariate analysis. Conclusion: This study represents the largest study where age was correlated to specific pain, depression, and disability outcomes following SCS. We provide evidence that SCS outcomes are equivalent, or better, in older patients following SCS. Based on these findings, SCS is a viable option for treatment of chronic pain in elderly patient populations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BMI as a Predictor of Spinal Cord Stimulation Success in Chronic Pain Patients
    Marola, Olivia
    Cherala, Rasan
    Prusik, Julia
    Kumar, Vignessh
    Fama, Chris
    Wilock, Meghan
    Crimmins, Jordan
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (03): : 269 - 273
  • [2] Use of a Psychological Evaluation Tool as a Predictor of Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes
    Prabhala, Tarun
    Kumar, Vignessh
    Gruenthal, Eric
    Collison, Claire
    Prusik, Julia
    Owusu, Stephanie
    Hobson, Ellie
    McCallum, Sarah E.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2019, 22 (02): : 194 - 199
  • [3] Duloxetine Improves Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain
    Prabhala, Tarun
    Sabourin, Shelby
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Gillogly, Michael
    Prusik, Julia
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2019, 22 (02): : 215 - 218
  • [4] Factors Contributing to Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain
    Graham, Dakota T.
    Lambert, Margaret
    Mirzadeh, Zaman
    Ponce, Francisco A.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2022, 25 (01): : 145 - 154
  • [5] SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION OUTCOMES FOR CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS
    ROGERS, JH
    MCFADDEN, IJ
    SAGE, J
    WIELDE, K
    LAMOUREUX, B
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 40 (02) : 156 - 156
  • [6] Spinal cord stimulation for pain
    Simpson, BA
    [J]. Proceedings of the 7th INS - Meeting of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2005, : 55 - 59
  • [7] Spinal Cord Stimulation and Pain
    Kemler, M. A.
    [J]. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 2 (03) : S88 - S94
  • [8] Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Park, Yunseo Linda
    Hunter, Jared
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Sabourin, Shelby
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Khazen, Olga
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (08): : 1357 - 1362
  • [9] Clinical Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation According to Pain Characteristics
    Ha, Jong-Ho
    Huh, Ryoong
    Kim, Shin-Gyeom
    Im, Soo-Bin
    Jeong, Je Hoon
    Hwang, Sun-Chul
    Shin, Dong-Seong
    Kim, Bum-Tae
    Chung, Moonyoung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 65 (02) : 276 - 286
  • [10] Cervical and cervicomedullary spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain: Efficacy and outcomes
    Chivukula, Srinivas
    Tempel, Zachary J.
    Weiner, Gregory M.
    Gande, Abhiram V.
    Chen, Ching-Jen
    Ding, Dale
    Moossy, John J.
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 127 : 33 - 41