Use of a Psychological Evaluation Tool as a Predictor of Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes

被引:18
|
作者
Prabhala, Tarun [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Vignessh [1 ]
Gruenthal, Eric [1 ]
Collison, Claire [1 ]
Prusik, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Owusu, Stephanie [1 ]
Hobson, Ellie [1 ]
McCallum, Sarah E. [2 ]
Pilitsis, Julie G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Albany, NY USA
[2] Albany Med Coll, Dept Neurosci & Expt Therapeut, Albany, NY 12208 USA
来源
NEUROMODULATION | 2019年 / 22卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chronic pain; outcome prediction; psychological evaluation tool; spinal cord stimulation; spinal cord stimulation outcomes;
D O I
10.1111/ner.12884
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction Preoperative work-up for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) includes a psychological assessment; however, no one psychological factor has correlated with poor outcomes across studies. We developed a Psychological Evaluation Tool for Spinal Cord Stimulation Candidacy (PETSCSC), which includes all factors in the literature found to correlate with outcomes. In this study, we examine whether PETSCSC correlates with postoperative outcomes. Methods Patients undergoing SCS were prospectively enrolled in this study. PETSCSC scores were obtained preoperatively. Numeric rating scale (NRS), global impression of change (GIC), pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Beck Depression Inventory were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Outcomes were correlated with PETSCSC scores. Results Thirty-four SCS patients had a mean follow-up of 9.88 +/- 2.91 months. At latest follow-up, we observed significant improvement in NRS, PCS, MPQ, and ODI. Total PETSCSC score exhibited significant correlation with GIC (p = 0.026, r = 0.380) and improvement in PCS total (p = 0.041, r = 0.351), and MPQ affective (p = 0.002, r = 0.517) scores. The PETSCSC emotive subset significantly correlated with GIC (p = 0.020, r = 0.395). The PETSCSC depression subset significantly correlated with improvement in PCS rumination (p = 0.009, r = 0.439), PCS helplessness (p = 0.021, r = 0.393), PCS total (p = 0.021, r = 0.394), and MPQ affective (p = 0.002, r = 0.501). The PETSCSC therapy subset significantly correlated with improvement in MPQ sensory (p = 0.026, r = -0.381) and MPQ affective (p < 0.001, r = 0.583). Discussion PETSCSC scores and subscores demonstrate significant correlation with pain outcomes used in assessment of SCS efficacy. Higher PETSCSC scores correlate with greater improvement in GIC, MPQ affective, and PCS scores. Stratification of these patients based on PETSCSC total and subset scores could help with prognostication.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:194 / 199
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychological evaluation in spinal cord stimulation therapy
    Doleys, DM
    Klapow, JC
    Hammer, M
    PAIN REVIEWS, 1997, 4 (03): : 189 - 207
  • [2] Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes
    Bondoc, Melanie
    Hancu, Maria
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Shao, Miriam M.
    Khazen, Olga
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 100 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [3] Use of Accelerometry as an Educational Tool for Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Pilot Study
    Carayannopoulos, Alexios
    Scarfo, Keith
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    Lee, Augustine
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 3597 - 3604
  • [4] Analysis of Psychological Characteristics Impacting Spinal Cord Stimulation Treatment Outcomes: A Prospective Assessment
    Sparkes, Elizabeth
    Duarte, Rui V.
    Mann, Stacey
    Lawrence, Tony R.
    Raphael, Jon H.
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2015, 18 (03) : E369 - E377
  • [5] Psychological Screening/Phenotyping as Predictors for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Claudia M. Campbell
    Robert N. Jamison
    Robert R. Edwards
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2013, 17
  • [6] Psychological Factors as Outcome Predictors for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Bendinger, Tomasz
    Plunkett, Nick
    Poole, Debbie
    Turnbull, David
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (06): : 465 - 471
  • [7] Psychological Screening/Phenotyping as Predictors for Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Campbell, Claudia M.
    Jamison, Robert N.
    Edwards, Robert R.
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2013, 17 (01)
  • [8] SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION REVISITED - PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS
    LEVITA, E
    SORKIN, BA
    WALTZ, JM
    APPLIED NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 49 (1-2) : 69 - 75
  • [9] Real world outcomes with spinal cord stimulation
    Luecke, Thorsten D.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 206
  • [10] Outcomes of spinal cord stimulation: Patient validation
    Anderson, VC
    Carlson, C
    Shatin, D
    NEUROMODULATION, 2001, 4 (01): : 11 - 17