Tacrolimus Once Daily (ADVAGRAF) Versus Twice Daily (PROGRAF) in De Novo Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Phase III Study

被引:139
|
作者
Kraemer, B. K. [1 ]
Charpentier, B. [2 ]
Backman, L. [3 ,4 ]
Silva, H. Tedesco, Jr. [5 ]
Mondragon-Ramirez, G. [6 ]
Cassuto-Viguier, E. [7 ]
Mourad, G. [8 ]
Sola, R. [9 ]
Rigotti, P. [10 ]
Ortuno Mirete, J. [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Med Klin 5, Univ Klinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Paris Sud, Hop Bicetre, Villejuif, France
[3] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Fundacao Oswaldo Ramos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Inst Mexicano Transplantes, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
[7] Serv Nephrol, Nice, France
[8] Hop Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
[9] Fundacio Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Azienda Osped Padova, Padua, Italy
[11] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Biopsy-proven acute rejection; immunosuppression; kidney transplantation; noninferiority study; prolonged-release tacrolimus; tacrolimus; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; RECIPIENTS; ADHERENCE; IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS; FORMULATION; THERAPY; LIVER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03256.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This multicenter, 1:1-randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority study compared the efficacy and safety of twice-daily tacrolimus (Tacrolimus BID; Prograf) and once-daily tacrolimus prolonged release (Tacrolimus QD; Advagraf), combined with steroids and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil without antibody induction, in 667 de novo kidney transplant recipients. A double-blind, double-dummy 24-week period was followed by an open extension of up to 12 months posttransplant. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rate at 24 weeks (primary endpoint, per-protocol analysis) was 15.8% for Tacrolimus BID versus 20.4% for Tacrolimus QD (p = 0.182; treatment difference 4.5%, 95% confidence interval-1.8%, 10.9%, just outside the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin). Kaplan-Meier 12-month patient and graft survival rates were 97.5% and 92.8% for Tacrolimus BID and 96.9% and 91.5% for QD. Both treatment groups showed equally well-maintained renal function at 12 months (mean creatinine clearance approximately 67 mL/min) and similar adverse event profiles. Overall results obtained with either Tacrolimus QD or BID, without antibody induction, were good, supporting use of the once-daily formulation as an effective alternative to the established twice-daily formulation.
引用
收藏
页码:2632 / 2643
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Significant reduction of Tacrolimus trough level after conversion from twice daily Prograf to once daily Advagraf in Chinese renal transplant recipients with or without concomitant diltiazem treatment
    Ma, Maggie K. M.
    Kwan, Lorraine P. Y.
    Mok, Maggie M. Y.
    Yap, Desmond Y. H.
    Tang, Colin S. O.
    Chan, Tak Mao
    [J]. RENAL FAILURE, 2013, 35 (07) : 942 - 945
  • [32] Once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus versus twice-daily tacrolimus in liver transplantation
    Huang, Bingsong
    Liu, Jun
    Li, Jun
    Schroder, Paul M.
    Chen, Maogen
    Deng, Ronghai
    Deng, Suxiong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 59 (06) : 816 - +
  • [33] Outcome of Conversion from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus (Prograf®) to Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus (Advagraf®) in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients: University of Bologna Experience
    Del Gaudio, Massimo
    Cescon, Matteo
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Zanello, Matteo
    Dazzi, Alessandro
    Lauro, Augusto
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Tame, Maria Rosa
    Morelli, Cristina
    Pinna, Antonio Daniele
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 17 (06) : S207 - S207
  • [34] Efficacy and Safety of Conversion from Tacrolimus Twice-Daily (Prograf®) to Tacrolimus Once-Daily Prolonged-Released (Advagraf®) in Liver Transplantation. An Italian Single-Center Experience
    Volpes, R.
    Galatioto, L.
    D'Antoni, A.
    Fili, D.
    Petridis, I.
    Pietrosi, G.
    Corsale, S.
    Sapere, M. C.
    Vizzini, G.
    Gridelli, B.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (10) : 47 - 47
  • [35] Population Pharmacokinetics of Tarolimus in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients on Two Different Formulations-Twice-daily Prograf® and Once-daily Advagraf®
    Yi, SoJeong
    Lim, Hyeong-Seok
    Yoon, Seonghae
    Moon, Seol Ju
    Min, Sang-il
    Ha, Jongwon
    Jang, In-Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2015, 42 : S52 - S52
  • [36] CONVERSION FROM TWICE-DAILY PROGRAF TO ONCE-DAILY ADVAGRAF IS STRAIGHTFORWARD IN STABLE LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Thorburn, D.
    Paczek, L.
    Wolf, P.
    Boillot, O.
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 : 211 - 211
  • [37] Comparison of Extended-Release, Once Daily Tacrolimus and Standard Twice Daily Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients
    Lim, T. Y.
    Shah, N.
    Shah, A.
    Mahgoub, S.
    Considine, A.
    Joshi, D.
    Sanchez-Fueyo, A.
    Suddle, A.
    Heaton, N.
    O'Grady, J.
    Heneghan, M. A.
    Agarwal, K.
    Aluvihare, V.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (05) : 120 - 120
  • [38] Conversion From Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended Release Tacrolimus (LCPT): The Phase III Randomized MELT Trial
    Bunnapradist, S.
    Ciechanowski, K.
    West-Thielke, P.
    Mulgaonkar, S.
    Rostaing, L.
    Vasudev, B.
    Budde, K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (03) : 760 - 769
  • [39] Multicenter Randomized Clinical Investigation for the Safety and Efficacy of Advagraf® (Extended-Release Tacrolimus) vs. Prograf® (Twice-Daily Tacrolimus) in De Novo Korean Adult Kidney Recipients.
    Oh, C.
    Huh, K.
    Lee, J.
    Lee, J.
    Cho, H.
    Kim, Y.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 : 317 - 317
  • [40] POOLED ANALYSIS TO EXAMINE THE PK AND SAFETY OF ONCE-DAILY EXTENDED-RELEASE MELTDOSE® TACROLIMUS TABLETS (ENVARSUS®) VS. TWICE-DAILY TACROLIMUS (PROGRAF®) IN DE NOVO KIDNEY AND LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Mulgaonkar, Shamkant
    Dubay, Derek
    Bunnapradist, Suphamai
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 202 - 202