The effect of an electronic health record-based tool on abnormal pediatric blood pressure recognition

被引:18
|
作者
Twichell, Sarah A. [1 ]
Rea, Corinna J. [1 ]
Melvin, Patrice [2 ]
Capraro, Andrew J. [1 ]
Mandel, Joshua C. [1 ]
Ferguson, Michael A. [1 ]
Nigrin, Daniel J. [1 ]
Mandl, Kenneth D. [1 ]
Graham, Dionne [2 ]
Zachariah, Justin P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Boston Childrens Hosp, Clin Res Program, Boston, MA USA
[3] Texas Childrens Hosp, Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
blood pressure; electronic health record; hypertension; pediatric; quality improvement; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS; BODY-MASS INDEX; YOUNG-ADULTS; PRIMARY-CARE; CHILDHOOD; HYPERTENSION; CHILDREN; ADOLESCENTS; SYSTEMS; FINNS;
D O I
10.1111/chd.12469
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Recognition of high blood pressure (BP) in children is poor, partly due to the need to compute age-sex-height referenced percentiles. This study examined the change in abnormal BP recognition before versus after the introduction of an electronic health record (EHR) app designed to calculate BP percentiles with a training lecture. Methods and results: Clinical data were extracted on all ambulatory, non-urgent encounters for children 3-18 years old seen in primary care, endocrinology, cardiology, or nephrology clinics at an urban, academic hospital in the year before and the year after app introduction. Outpatients with at least 1 BP above the age-gender-height referenced 90th percentile were included. Abnormal BP recognition was defined as a BP related ICD-9 code, referral to nephrology or cardiology, an echocardiogram or renal ultrasound to evaluate BP concern, or a follow-up primary care visit for BP monitoring. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression compared odds of recognition before and after app introduction. Of 78 768 clinical encounters, 3521 had abnormal BP in the pre- and 3358 in the post-app period. App use occurred in 13% of elevated BP visits. Overall, abnormal BP was recognized in 4.9% pre-app period visits and 7.1% of visits post-app (P < .0001). Recognition was significantly higher when the app was actually used (adjusted OR 3.17 95% CI 2.29-4.41, P < .001). Without app use recognition was not different. Conclusions: BP app advent modestly increased abnormal BP recognition in the entire cohort, but actual app use was associated with significantly higher recognition. Predictors of abnormal BP recognition deserve further scrutiny.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 490
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Electronic Medical Record-Based Decision Support Tool for the Diagnosis of Primary Hyperparathyroidism
    Tseng, Chi-Hong
    Kim, Jiyoon
    Nguyen, Dalena T.
    Leung, Angela M.
    Yeh, Michael W.
    Dawood, Nardeen B.
    Shu, Michelle L.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 182 (09) : 1000 - 1002
  • [32] Implementing Electronic Health Record-Based Quality Measures for Developmental Screening
    Jensen, Roxanne E.
    Chan, Kitty S.
    Weiner, Jonathan P.
    Fowles, Jinnet B.
    Neale, Shannon M.
    PEDIATRICS, 2009, 124 (04) : E648 - E654
  • [33] Bias of Inaccurate Disease Mentions in Electronic Health Record-based Phenotyping
    Kagawa, Rina
    Shinohara, Emiko
    Imari, Takeshi
    Kawazoe, Yoshimasa
    Ohe, Kazuhiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 124 : 90 - 96
  • [34] Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care
    Singh, Hardeep
    Giardina, Traber Davis
    Forjuoh, Samuel N.
    Reis, Michael D.
    Kosmach, Steven
    Khan, Myrna M.
    Thomas, Eric J.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [35] Electronic health record-based patient tracking by emergency medicine physicians
    Villalba, Constanza
    Burke, Ryan C.
    Gurley, Kiersten
    Dhaliwal, Gurpreet
    Grossman, Shamai
    AEM EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [36] Pharmacist Hypertension Management Using an Electronic Health Record-Based Approach
    Soreide, Kristin K.
    Solomon, Octavia
    Farhat, Nada M.
    Kolander, Sarah
    Gottschall, Terry
    George, Diane L.
    Szandzik, Edward G.
    Kalus, James S.
    Thomas, Emily
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2022, 28 (04): : E121 - E125
  • [37] A narrative review on the validity of electronic health record-based research in epidemiology
    Gianfrancesco, Milena A.
    Goldstein, Neal D.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [38] The Evolution of Electronic Health Record-Based Drug Information Systems in Canada
    Bishop, Kurtis
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2005, 58 : 18 - 18
  • [39] Bias in electronic health record-based studies: Seeing the forest for the trees
    Arterburn, David
    Aminian, Ali
    Nissen, Steve
    Schauer, Phil
    Haneuse, Sebastien
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2021, 23 (07): : 1692 - 1693
  • [40] Test collections for electronic health record-based clinical information retrieval
    Wang, Yanshan
    Wen, Andrew
    Liu, Sijia
    Hersh, William
    Bedrick, Steven
    Liu, Hongfang
    JAMIA OPEN, 2019, 2 (03) : 360 - 368