Foreign Direct Investment to Africa: Is There a Colonial Legacy?

被引:19
|
作者
Glaister, Keith W. [1 ]
Driffield, Nigel [2 ]
Lin, Yupu [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Business Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Aston, Aston Business Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Colonisation; Inward FDI; Africa; Institutional theory; Liability of foreignness; INSTITUTION-BASED VIEW; INFORMAL INSTITUTIONS; HISTORICAL TIES; COUNTRY IMAGE; LIABILITY; IMPACT; LOCATION; DISTANCE; MATTERS; COLONIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11575-020-00415-w
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
To provide new understanding of the effect of historical ties in the field of international business, through the lens of institutional theory and the concept of the liability of foreignness, we examine how prior colonial relationships influence inward FDI from former colonisers to their former colonies in Africa. With an estimation based on a balanced panel of annual observations from 2001 to 2012, we find that prior colonial ties are positively related to inward FDI from colonisers to former colonies. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in colonial relationships, with the nature of British colonialism more likely to exhibit the colonial relationship in explaining inward FDI. Moreover, there is ambiguity associated with the influence of the time period of colonization and the time period of independence on inward FDI. We report a negative relationship between the period a country was a colony and FDI from the coloniser and a U-shape relationship between the period of independence and FDI from the coloniser. Our findings indicate that the nature and influence of colonial ties on FDI from colonisers are more nuanced and complex than previously considered.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 349
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条