Simulation and Peak Value Estimation of Non-Gaussian Wind Pressures Based on Johnson Transformation Model

被引:32
|
作者
Wu, Fengbo [1 ]
Huang, Guoqing [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Min [2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chongqing 40044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Simulation; Peak value estimation; Non-Gaussian wind pressures; Hermite polynomial model; Johnson transformation model; Translation function; STOCHASTIC-PROCESS; LOAD; DENSITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001697
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The simulation and peak value estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures are important to the structural and cladding design of the building. Due to its straightforwardness and accuracy, the moment-based Hermite polynomial model (HPM) has been widely used. However, its effective region for monotonicity is limited, resulting in its unsuitability for non-Gaussian processes whose skewness and kurtosis are out of the effective region. On the other hand, the Johnson transformation model (JTM) has attracted attention due to its larger effective region compared with that of the HPM. Nevertheless, the systematic study of its application to the simulation and peak value estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures is less addressed. Specifically, its comparison with the HPM is not well discussed. In this study, a set of closed-form formulas to determine the relationship between correlation coefficients of the non-Gaussian process and those of the underlying Gaussian process was derived, and they facilitate a JTM-based simulation method for the non-Gaussian process. Analytical expressions for the non-Gaussian peak factor were developed. Furthermore, the JTM was systematically compared with the HPM in terms of the translation function, which helps to understand the ensuing performance evaluation on these two models in the simulation and peak value estimation based on the very long wind pressure data. Results showed that the JTM-based peak value estimation method performs well for wind pressures with weak to mild non-Gaussianity, even those beyond the effective region of the HPM, although it may provide slightly worse estimation for strong softening processes compared with the HPM.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Numerical simulation of non-Gaussian wind load
    JiHong Ye
    JingHu Ding
    ChuanYan Liu
    Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 55 : 3057 - 3069
  • [22] Numerical simulation of non-Gaussian wind load
    YE JiHong DING JingHu LIU ChuanYan Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of Ministry of EducationSoutheast UniversityNanjing China
    Science China(Technological Sciences), 2012, 55 (11) : 3057 - 3069
  • [23] Peak Factor Deviation Ratio Method for Division of Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Wind Pressures on High-Rise Buildings
    Huang, Dongmei
    Zhu, Zhaokun
    Xie, Hongling
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [24] Numerical simulation of non-Gaussian wind load
    Ye JiHong
    Ding JingHu
    Liu ChuanYan
    SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 55 (11) : 3057 - 3069
  • [25] Peak factor estimation method of non-Gaussian wind pressures on long-span tri-centered cylindrical roof structures
    Wu, Yanru
    Wen, Zhang
    Wu, Xiaohong
    Lv, Hang
    Sun, Qing
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2023, 32 (03):
  • [26] Johnson curve model based CDF mapping method for estimating extreme values of the measured non-Gaussian wind pressures including the non-stationary effect investigation
    Li, Jinhua
    Zhu, Desen
    Li, Chunxiang
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2023, 190
  • [27] Bias and sampling errors in estimation of extremes of non-Gaussian wind pressures by moment-based translation process models
    Yang, Qingshan
    Chen, Xinzhong
    Liu, Min
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2019, 186 : 214 - 233
  • [28] Numerical simulation of non-gaussian process of wind waves
    Liu Xin’an and Huang Peiji(Received June 4
    accepted October 10
    ActaOceanologicaSinica, 1991, (02) : 199 - 216
  • [29] Non-Gaussian Lagrangian Stochastic Model for Wind Field Simulation in the Surface Layer
    Liu, Chao
    Fu, Li
    Yang, Dan
    Miller, David R.
    Wang, Junming
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (01) : 90 - 104
  • [30] Non-Gaussian Lagrangian Stochastic Model for Wind Field Simulation in the Surface Layer
    Chao LIU
    Li FU
    Dan YANG
    David R.MILLER
    Junming WANG
    AdvancesinAtmosphericSciences, 2020, 37 (01) : 90 - 104