Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction

被引:170
|
作者
Dodangeh, Esmaeel [1 ]
Choubin, Bahram [2 ]
Eigdir, Ahmad Najafi [2 ]
Nabipour, Narjes [3 ]
Panahi, Mehdi [4 ]
Shamshirband, Shahaboddin [5 ,6 ]
Mosavi, Amir [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management, POB 737, Sari, Iran
[2] AREEO, Soil Conservat & Watershed Management Res Dept, West Azarbaijan Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ct, Orumiyeh, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, North Tehran Branch, Dept Geophys, Young Researchers & Elites Club, Tehran, Iran
[5] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[7] Obuda Univ, Kalman Kando Fac Elect Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[8] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Built Environm, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
关键词
Resampling approach; Random subsampling; Bootstrapping; Flood susceptibility; Machine learning; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; STATISTICAL-MODELS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; HAZARD AREAS; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flood susceptibility projections relying on standalone models, with one-time train-test data splitting for model calibration, yields biased results. This study proposed novel integrative flood susceptibility prediction models based on multi-time resampling approaches, random subsampling (RS) and bootstrapping (BT) algorithms, integrated with machine learning models: generalized additive model (GAM), boosted regression tree (BTR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). RS and BT algorithms provided 10 runs of data resampling for learning and validation of the models. Then the mean of 10 runs of predictions is used to produce the flood susceptibility maps (BM). This methodology was applied to Ardabil Province on coastal margins of the Caspian Sea which faced destructive floods. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and true skill statistic (TSS) and correlation coefficient (COR) were utilized to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the proposed models. Results demonstrated that resampling algorithms improved the performance of Standalone GAM, MARS and BRT models. Results also revealed that Standalone models had better performance with the BT algorithm compared to the RS algorithm. BT-GAM model attained superior performance in terms of statistical measures (AUC = 0.98, TSS = 0.93, COR = 0.91), followed by BT-MARS (AUC = 0.97, TSS = 0.93, COR = 0.91) and BT-BRT model (AUC = 0.95, TSS = 0.79, COR = 0.79). Results demonstrated that the proposed models outperformed the benchmark models such as Standalone GAM, MARS, BRT, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM). Given the admirable performance of the proposed models in a large scale area, the promising results can be expected from these models for other regions. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New Machine Learning Ensemble for Flood Susceptibility Estimation
    Romulus Costache
    Alireza Arabameri
    Iulia Costache
    Anca Crăciun
    Binh Thai Pham
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 4765 - 4783
  • [42] Comparative Presentation of Machine Learning Algorithms in Flood Prediction Using Spatio-Temporal Data
    Jangyodsuk, Piraporn
    Seo, Dong-Jun
    Elmasri, Ramez
    Gao, Jean
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, SIGNAL PROCESSING, AND SYSTEMS, 2016, 386 : 1015 - 1023
  • [43] Prediction of Arrhythmia with Machine Learning Algorithms
    Gursoy, Gunes
    Varol, Asaf
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL FORENSICS AND SECURITY (ISDFS'21), 2021,
  • [44] Conditioning factors determination for mapping and prediction of landslide susceptibility using machine learning algorithms
    Al-Najjar, Husam A. H.
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Pradhan, Biswjaeet
    Saeidi, Vahideh
    [J]. EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING/GIS APPLICATIONS X, 2019, 11156
  • [45] Prediction of gully erosion susceptibility mapping using novel ensemble machine learning algorithms
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Pal, Subodh Chandra
    Costache, Romulus
    Saha, Asish
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    Danesh, Amir Seyed
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Lee, Saro
    Nhat-Duc Hoang
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 469 - 498
  • [46] Predicting dropout from psychological treatment using different machine learning algorithms, resampling methods, and sample sizes
    Giesemann, Julia
    Delgadillo, Jaime
    Schwartz, Brian
    Bennemann, Bjoern
    Lutz, Wolfgang
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2023, 33 (06) : 683 - 695
  • [47] Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using SAR Data and Machine Learning Algorithms in a Small Watershed in Northwestern Morocco
    Hitouri, Sliman
    Mohajane, Meriame
    Lahsaini, Meriam
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Setargie, Tadesual Asamin
    Tripathi, Gaurav
    D'Antonio, Paola
    Singh, Suraj Kumar
    Varasano, Antonietta
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [48] Flood susceptibility mapping using machine learning boosting algorithms techniques in Idukki district of Kerala India
    Saravanan, Subbarayan
    Abijith, Devanantham
    Reddy, Nagireddy Masthan
    Parthasarathy, K. S. S.
    Janardhanam, Niraimathi
    Sathiyamurthi, Subbarayan
    Sivakumar, Vivek
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2023, 49
  • [49] Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms
    Marjanovic, Milos
    Bajat, Branislav
    Kovacevic, Milos
    [J]. 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT NETWORKING AND COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS (INCOS 2009), 2009, : 273 - +
  • [50] Evaluating Factors Affecting Flood Susceptibility in the Yangtze River Delta Using Machine Learning Methods
    Kaili Zhu
    Zhaoli Wang
    Chengguang Lai
    Shanshan Li
    Zhaoyang Zeng
    Xiaohong Chen
    [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science., 2024, 15 (05) - 753