Integrated machine learning methods with resampling algorithms for flood susceptibility prediction

被引:170
|
作者
Dodangeh, Esmaeel [1 ]
Choubin, Bahram [2 ]
Eigdir, Ahmad Najafi [2 ]
Nabipour, Narjes [3 ]
Panahi, Mehdi [4 ]
Shamshirband, Shahaboddin [5 ,6 ]
Mosavi, Amir [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management, POB 737, Sari, Iran
[2] AREEO, Soil Conservat & Watershed Management Res Dept, West Azarbaijan Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ct, Orumiyeh, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Islamic Azad Univ, North Tehran Branch, Dept Geophys, Young Researchers & Elites Club, Tehran, Iran
[5] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Dept Management Sci & Technol Dev, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] Ton Duc Thang Univ, Fac Informat Technol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[7] Obuda Univ, Kalman Kando Fac Elect Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[8] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Built Environm, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
关键词
Resampling approach; Random subsampling; Bootstrapping; Flood susceptibility; Machine learning; FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; ADAPTIVE REGRESSION SPLINES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; STATISTICAL-MODELS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; HAZARD AREAS; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135983
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Flood susceptibility projections relying on standalone models, with one-time train-test data splitting for model calibration, yields biased results. This study proposed novel integrative flood susceptibility prediction models based on multi-time resampling approaches, random subsampling (RS) and bootstrapping (BT) algorithms, integrated with machine learning models: generalized additive model (GAM), boosted regression tree (BTR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). RS and BT algorithms provided 10 runs of data resampling for learning and validation of the models. Then the mean of 10 runs of predictions is used to produce the flood susceptibility maps (BM). This methodology was applied to Ardabil Province on coastal margins of the Caspian Sea which faced destructive floods. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and true skill statistic (TSS) and correlation coefficient (COR) were utilized to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the proposed models. Results demonstrated that resampling algorithms improved the performance of Standalone GAM, MARS and BRT models. Results also revealed that Standalone models had better performance with the BT algorithm compared to the RS algorithm. BT-GAM model attained superior performance in terms of statistical measures (AUC = 0.98, TSS = 0.93, COR = 0.91), followed by BT-MARS (AUC = 0.97, TSS = 0.93, COR = 0.91) and BT-BRT model (AUC = 0.95, TSS = 0.79, COR = 0.79). Results demonstrated that the proposed models outperformed the benchmark models such as Standalone GAM, MARS, BRT, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and support vector machine (SVM). Given the admirable performance of the proposed models in a large scale area, the promising results can be expected from these models for other regions. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of flood susceptibility prediction based on a resampling method using machine learning
    Aldiansyah, Septianto
    Wardani, Farida
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 14 (03) : 937 - 961
  • [2] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Flood Susceptibility Mapping
    Seydi, Seyd Teymoor
    Kanani-Sadat, Yousef
    Hasanlou, Mahdi
    Sahraei, Roya
    Chanussot, Jocelyn
    Amani, Meisam
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [3] DIAGNOSIS OF THE DISEASES USING RESAMPLING METHODS WITH MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Celik, Ahmet
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES, 2023, 76 (07): : 1065 - 1076
  • [4] Forest Fire Susceptibility Prediction Based on Machine Learning Models with Resampling Algorithms on Remote Sensing Data
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Ueda, Naonori
    Idrees, Mohammed O.
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    Ahmadi, Kourosh
    Shabani, Farzin
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (22) : 1 - 24
  • [5] Spatial modeling of flood susceptibility using machine learning algorithms
    Meliho M.
    Khattabi A.
    Asinyo J.
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14 (21)
  • [6] Can deep learning algorithms outperform benchmark machine learning algorithms in flood susceptibility modeling?
    Binh Thai Pham
    Chinh Luu
    Tran Van Phong
    Phan Trong Trinh
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Renoud, Somayeh
    Asadi, Shahrokh
    Hiep Van Le
    von Meding, Jason
    Clague, John J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 592
  • [7] Prediction Success of Machine Learning Methods for Flash Flood Susceptibility Mapping in the Tafresh Watershed, Iran
    Janizadeh, Saeid
    Avand, Mohammadtaghi
    Jaafari, Abolfazl
    Tran Van Phong
    Bayat, Mahmoud
    Ahmadisharaf, Ebrahim
    Prakash, Indra
    Binh Thai Pham
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [8] Flood Hydrograph Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods
    Tayfur, Gokmen
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Moramarco, Tommaso
    Barbetta, Silvia
    [J]. WATER, 2018, 10 (08)
  • [9] Application of machine learning algorithms for flood susceptibility assessment and risk management
    Madhuri, R.
    Sistla, S.
    Srinivasa Raju, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (06) : 2608 - 2623
  • [10] Ensemble of machine learning algorithms for cryptocurrency investment with different data resampling methods
    Borges, Tome Almeida
    Neves, Rui Ferreira
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 90